CLSK
Price
$15.14
Change
+$0.38 (+2.57%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.72B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUT
Price
$106.61
Change
+$3.19 (+3.08%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
12.17B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs HUT

CLSK vs HUT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. HUT commentary
Sep 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Buy and HUT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs HUT: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3434
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9150
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
842
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a46

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLSK's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (96). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (91). This means that HUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (98). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (40). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (84). This means that HUT’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKHUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CLSK: $14.76 vs. HUT: $103.42)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and HUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 102% vs. HUT: 113%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $3.72B vs. HUT: $12.17B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.72B. HUT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $590 to $318.17B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while HUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HUT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than HUT.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +11.23% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +13.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +9.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.

HUT is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+9.67% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICLR169.555.44
+3.31%
ICON plc
WLYB47.150.47
+1.01%
John Wiley & Sons
KRSP10.50N/A
N/A
Rice Acquisition Corporation 3
SCOR4.87-0.09
-1.81%
comScore
SMTK1.79-0.40
-18.26%
Smartkem Inc