Advertisement
CLSK vs ZS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Zscaler (ZS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CLSK operates primarily in Bitcoin mining while pursuing diversification into AI data center infrastructure through major lease agreements, introducing both growth potential and execution risks.
- ZS delivers cloud-native Zero Trust cybersecurity solutions with consistent recurring revenue growth, positioning it as a more stable play in the enterprise software sector.
- Recent market activity shows CLSK experiencing heightened volatility tied to Bitcoin price swings and earnings impacts, contrasted with ZS demonstrating steadier performance supported by strong quarterly results and analyst upgrades.
- Sector exposure differs markedly: CLSK faces cryptocurrency and energy market dependencies, while ZS benefits from sustained demand for digital security amid rising AI-related threats.
- Relative performance in recent weeks highlights trade-offs between CLSK’s higher-beta momentum potential and ZS’s emphasis on predictable cash flow generation and margin expansion.
- Market sentiment reflects cautious optimism for both, with CLSK navigating transition challenges and ZS capitalizing on cybersecurity tailwinds.
Introduction
This comparison examines CLSK and ZS to provide traders and investors with a clear view of their relative positioning in the current market environment. CleanSpark represents a digital infrastructure company with roots in cryptocurrency mining that is expanding into artificial intelligence facilities. Zscaler offers enterprise cybersecurity platforms centered on Zero Trust architecture. The analysis appeals to investors seeking to understand contrasts between high-volatility growth assets linked to emerging technologies and established software businesses with recurring revenue models. It focuses on observable performance metrics, business drivers, and sector dynamics without forward-looking projections.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark develops and operates data centers supporting Bitcoin mining and other compute-intensive applications. The company has pursued diversification through long-term leases for artificial intelligence infrastructure. In recent market activity, shares displayed notable volatility influenced by cryptocurrency price movements and quarterly financial results. Third-quarter fiscal results reflected revenue of $138 million alongside a net loss driven primarily by non-cash Bitcoin valuation adjustments. A significant development involved a multi-billion-dollar AI data center lease agreement, which has contributed to shifting perceptions of the business model toward more contracted revenue streams. Sentiment has been shaped by broader Bitcoin market dynamics and the pace of infrastructure project execution, resulting in price swings that exceeded broader market benchmarks in recent weeks.
ZS Overview and Recent Performance
Zscaler provides cloud-based Zero Trust security solutions that protect enterprise networks and applications. The company reports strong recurring revenue through its Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) model. Recent performance has been supported by consistent quarterly growth, with fiscal third-quarter revenue rising 25% year over year to $850 million and ARR reaching $3.525 billion. Positive analyst commentary, including price target increases, has contributed to share price resilience. Market activity in recent weeks reflects steady demand for cybersecurity amid evolving digital threats, including those associated with artificial intelligence deployments. The stock has shown lower volatility relative to cryptocurrency-linked names, with performance influenced by enterprise spending patterns and competitive positioning in the security software space.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated section highlighting its most effective AI trading bots suited to prevailing market conditions. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that execute strategies across thousands of different tickers, yet only those demonstrating superior alignment with current trends, risk parameters, and performance statistics earn placement in the Trending AI Robots listing. Available bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, and statistical profiles, allowing users to select approaches that match specific objectives. This section provides transparent metrics on historical results and strategy characteristics to inform decision-making. Explore the full selection at Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models present clear contrasts: CLSK derives revenue from energy-intensive mining operations while transitioning portions of capacity toward leased AI infrastructure, whereas ZS generates predictable subscription income from cybersecurity services. Growth drivers differ accordingly, with CLSK sensitive to Bitcoin valuations and power costs, and ZS benefiting from expanding enterprise adoption of cloud security. Recent momentum favors ZS in terms of earnings consistency and analyst support, while CLSK has experienced sharper swings tied to sector-specific news. Risk factors include cryptocurrency exposure and project financing needs for CLSK versus competitive pressures in cybersecurity for ZS. Sector exposure places CLSK at the intersection of digital assets and data centers, in contrast to ZS’s focus on information technology security. Overall market sentiment reflects these distinctions, with investors weighing volatility against visibility in cash flows.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, revenue stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probabilistic weighting to ZS. The assessment draws from ZS’s recurring revenue visibility and lower sensitivity to external commodity fluctuations compared with CLSK’s cryptocurrency-linked profile and ongoing infrastructure transition. This represents a probabilistic evaluation rather than a definitive recommendation.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and ZS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- ZS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +8.83% price change this week, while ZS (@Computer Communications) price change was -7.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +366.94%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.
ZS is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.22% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Computer Communications (-1.84% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CLSK | ZS | CLSK / ZS | |
| Capitalization | 3.26B | 27.7B | 12% |
| EBITDA | -572.87M | 179M | -320% |
| Gain YTD | 25.395 | -24.506 | -104% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 679M | 3.35B | 20% |
| Total Cash | 795M | 3.47B | 23% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 1.86B | 96% |
CLSK | ZS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZS's Valuation (57) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (83) in the null industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
ZS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (100) in the null industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
ZS's SMR Rating (92) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (98) in the null industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
ZS's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CLSK (50) in the null industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | ZS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 12 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
ZS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZS has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.