It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLST (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while WSBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
CLST is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2023.
WSBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CLST | WSBC | CLST / WSBC | |
Capitalization | 54M | 1.74B | 3% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 6.919 | 10.130 | 68% |
P/E Ratio | 84.57 | 11.65 | 726% |
Revenue | 9.14M | 595M | 2% |
Total Cash | N/A | 274M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 1.74B | - |
CLST | WSBC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WSBC's Valuation (48) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (89) in the null industry. This means that WSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.
CLST's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSBC (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLST’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSBC’s over the last 12 months.
WSBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLST (89) in the null industry. This means that WSBC’s stock grew significantly faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.
WSBC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLST (52) in the null industry. This means that WSBC’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.
WSBC's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (82) in the null industry. This means that WSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.
CLST | WSBC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago66% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago42% | 8 days ago59% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 6 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago66% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago66% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FFBGX | 38.20 | -0.81 | -2.08% |
American Funds Global Balanced 529-F-3 | |||
TGVIX | 26.49 | -0.67 | -2.47% |
Thornburg International Equity I | |||
SEGPX | 47.51 | -1.21 | -2.48% |
NAA Large Cap Value P | |||
AWPAX | 18.94 | -0.52 | -2.67% |
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A | |||
SUSIX | 14.04 | -0.41 | -2.84% |
State Street Instl US Equity Inv |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLST and WSBC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLST and WSBC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLST | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLST | 100% | -0.43% | ||
WSBC - CLST | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
CHMG - CLST | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.85% | ||
BMRC - CLST | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
PPBI - CLST | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.42% | ||
EFSC - CLST | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSBC has been closely correlated with BUSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSBC jumps, then BUSE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WSBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WSBC | 100% | -4.60% | ||
BUSE - WSBC | 89% Closely correlated | -5.64% | ||
UBSI - WSBC | 88% Closely correlated | -5.62% | ||
NWBI - WSBC | 88% Closely correlated | -5.73% | ||
FCF - WSBC | 88% Closely correlated | -5.38% | ||
SFNC - WSBC | 87% Closely correlated | -5.13% | ||
More |