Ad is loading...
CLSZF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
CTXAF
Price
$18.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CLSZF vs CTXAF

Header iconCLSZF vs CTXAF Comparison
Open Charts CLSZF vs CTXAFBanner chart's image
China Oil & Gas Group
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.2K
CapitalizationN/A
Ampol
Price$18.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$499
CapitalizationN/A
CLSZF vs CTXAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSZF vs. CTXAF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSZF is a Hold and CTXAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CLSZF: $0.02 vs. CTXAF: $18.30)
Brand notoriety: CLSZF and CTXAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSZF: 100% vs. CTXAF: 164%
Market capitalization -- CLSZF: $175.67M vs. CTXAF: $5.25B
CLSZF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $175.67M. CTXAF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $5.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $73.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCTXAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CTXAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTXAF is a better buy in the long-term than CLSZF.

Price Growth

CLSZF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CTXAF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+0.41% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTXAF($5.25B) has a higher market cap than CLSZF($176M). CTXAF has higher P/E ratio than CLSZF: CTXAF (10.16) vs CLSZF (1.61). CLSZF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CTXAF (-24.908). CLSZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.57B vs. CTXAF (1.49B). CLSZF has more cash in the bank: 3.69B vs. CTXAF (126M). CTXAF has less debt than CLSZF: CTXAF (3.61B) vs CLSZF (8.77B). CTXAF has higher revenues than CLSZF: CTXAF (38.2B) vs CLSZF (15.6B).
CLSZFCTXAFCLSZF / CTXAF
Capitalization176M5.25B3%
EBITDA2.57B1.49B172%
Gain YTD0.000-24.908-
P/E Ratio1.6110.1616%
Revenue15.6B38.2B41%
Total Cash3.69B126M2,928%
Total Debt8.77B3.61B243%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSZF vs CTXAF: Fundamental Ratings
CLSZF
CTXAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8363
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8892
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTXAF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSZF (52). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to CLSZF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSZF (100). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to CLSZF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSZF (95). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to CLSZF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSZF (83). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to CLSZF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSZF's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (92). This means that CLSZF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSXCX8.48-0.03
-0.35%
Hartford Schroders Diversified Em Mkts C
AUXFX30.73-0.13
-0.42%
Auxier Focus Inv
HDGYX38.70-0.20
-0.51%
Hartford Dividend and Growth Y
TESGX9.12-0.09
-0.98%
Templeton Global Smaller Comp C
FMCCX47.82-0.52
-1.08%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp I

CLSZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSZF and CTXAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSZF and CTXAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSZF
1D Price
Change %
CLSZF100%
N/A
CTXAF - CLSZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PARR - CLSZF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
CAPL - CLSZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
PBF - CLSZF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
UGP - CLSZF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
More

CTXAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXAF and CLSZF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXAF and CLSZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXAF
1D Price
Change %
CTXAF100%
N/A
CLSZF - CTXAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIY - CTXAF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
PKIUF - CTXAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEOL - CTXAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBSFY - CTXAF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.10%
More