It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.26% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.
CMA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CMA | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMA | RDVY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago68% | 7 days ago88% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CMA | 100% | -1.66% | ||
ZION - CMA | 84% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
RF - CMA | 81% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
ABCB - CMA | 80% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
PNFP - CMA | 80% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
OCFC - CMA | 79% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDVY has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RDVY jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RDVY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RDVY | 100% | -0.93% | ||
HBAN - RDVY | 82% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
CMA - RDVY | 79% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
EQH - RDVY | 78% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
USB - RDVY | 78% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
PFG - RDVY | 77% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More |