Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMAIX vs PABAX
CMAIX vs PABAX Comparison
Open Charts CMAIX vs PABAX
Invesco Select Risk: Mod Cnsv Inv R5
Price$10.96
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets264.36M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.29
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
CMAIX vs PABAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMAIX vs. PABAX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMAIX is a Hold and PABAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PABAX has more cash in the bank: 2.17B vs. CMAIX (264M). CMAIX pays higher dividends than PABAX: CMAIX (2.80) vs PABAX (2.62). CMAIX was incepted earlier than PABAX: CMAIX (20 years) vs PABAX (31 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CMAIX (0.66). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. CMAIX (49.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMAIX: PABAX (0) vs CMAIX (1000000). CMAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.99 vs. PABAX (0.86). PABAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.65 vs. CMAIX (9.26).
| CMAIX | PABAX | CMAIX / PABAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.717 | 3.875 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 2.17B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 2.62 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.99 | 0.86 | 810% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.51 | 16.18 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.26 | 18.65 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.38 | 28.38 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement