Ad is loading...
CMAIX vs PABAX
CMAIX vs PABAX Comparison
Open Charts CMAIX vs PABAX
Invesco Select Risk: Mod Cnsv Inv R5
Price$10.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.3M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$15.65
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.1B
CMAIX vs PABAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMAIX vs. PABAX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMAIX is a StrongBuy and PABAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PABAX has more cash in the bank: 2.1B vs. CMAIX (259M). CMAIX pays higher dividends than PABAX: CMAIX (2.87) vs PABAX (2.71). CMAIX was incepted earlier than PABAX: CMAIX (20 years) vs PABAX (31 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CMAIX (0.61). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. CMAIX (49.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMAIX: PABAX (0) vs CMAIX (1000000). CMAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.81 vs. PABAX (1.48). PABAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.30 vs. CMAIX (14.49).
| CMAIX | PABAX | CMAIX / PABAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.505 | -0.517 | -98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 259M | 2.1B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 2.71 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.81 | 1.48 | 460% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.10 | 11.42 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.49 | 23.30 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.40 | 21.72 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers