Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMAIX vs PABAX
CMAIX vs PABAX Comparison
Open Charts CMAIX vs PABAX
Invesco Select Risk: Mod Cnsv Inv R5
Price$11.12
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.93M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.83
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
CMAIX vs PABAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMAIX vs. PABAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMAIX is a StrongBuy and PABAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PABAX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. CMAIX (269M). CMAIX pays higher dividends than PABAX: CMAIX (2.96) vs PABAX (2.13). CMAIX was incepted earlier than PABAX: CMAIX (20 years) vs PABAX (31 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CMAIX (0.66). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. CMAIX (49.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMAIX: PABAX (0) vs CMAIX (1000000). CMAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.16 vs. PABAX (2.50). PABAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.03 vs. CMAIX (12.91).
| CMAIX | PABAX | CMAIX / PABAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.909 | 7.121 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269M | 2.24B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.13 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | 2.50 | 366% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.17 | 27.09 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.91 | 23.03 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.88 | 32.91 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement