Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMAIX vs PABAX
CMAIX vs PABAX Comparison
Open Charts CMAIX vs PABAX
Invesco Select Risk: Mod Cnsv Inv R5
Price$11.26
Change-$0.04 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets270.25M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.02
Change-$0.06 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
CMAIX vs PABAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMAIX vs. PABAX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMAIX is a Hold and PABAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PABAX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. CMAIX (270M). PABAX (2.98) and CMAIX (2.96) have matching dividends . CMAIX was incepted earlier than PABAX: CMAIX (20 years) vs PABAX (32 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CMAIX (0.66). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. CMAIX (49.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMAIX: PABAX (0) vs CMAIX (1000000). CMAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. PABAX (1.95). PABAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.47 vs. CMAIX (9.70).
| CMAIX | PABAX | CMAIX / PABAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.623 | 9.713 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270M | 2.28B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.98 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 1.95 | 373% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.60 | 25.42 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.70 | 18.47 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.08 | 39.83 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement