CMAUF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
PMCCF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

CMAUF vs PMCCF

Header iconCMAUF vs PMCCF Comparison
Open Charts CMAUF vs PMCCFBanner chart's image
Chibougamau Independant Mines
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Peloton Minerals
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
CMAUF vs PMCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMAUF vs. PMCCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMAUF is a Buy and PMCCF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CMAUF: $0.10 vs. PMCCF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: CMAUF and PMCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMAUF: 4% vs. PMCCF: 3%
Market capitalization -- CMAUF: $5.3M vs. PMCCF: $9.11M
CMAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.3M. PMCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $9.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMAUF is a better buy in the long-term than PMCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMAUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMAUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PMCCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMAUF is a better buy in the short-term than PMCCF.

Price Growth

CMAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +11.11% price change this week, while PMCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +25.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCCF($9.11M) has a higher market cap than CMAUF($5.3M). CMAUF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. PMCCF (-46.847). PMCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -558.87K vs. CMAUF (-1.18M). CMAUF has more cash in the bank: 589K vs. PMCCF (51.2K). CMAUF has less debt than PMCCF: CMAUF (53.2K) vs PMCCF (100K). CMAUF has higher revenues than PMCCF: CMAUF (30K) vs PMCCF (0).
CMAUFPMCCFCMAUF / PMCCF
Capitalization5.3M9.11M58%
EBITDA-1.18M-558.87K212%
Gain YTD0.000-46.847-
P/E RatioN/A18.76-
Revenue30K0-
Total Cash589K51.2K1,150%
Total Debt53.2K100K53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMAUF vs PMCCF: Fundamental Ratings
CMAUF
PMCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3876
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
456
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4683
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9996
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMAUF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (88). This means that CMAUF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

CMAUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (100). This means that CMAUF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMAUF (45). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMAUF’s over the last 12 months.

CMAUF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMCCF (83). This means that CMAUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CMAUF (99). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew similarly to CMAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAUFPMCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMIJX23.86N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value Member
CGIOX49.52-0.18
-0.36%
Calamos Growth and Income R6
MGWRX62.73-0.27
-0.43%
MFS Global Growth R2
DFEOX44.44-0.29
-0.65%
DFA US Core Equity 1 I
PEMCX13.53-0.14
-1.02%
Principal Edge MidCap A

CMAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMAUF and PMCCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMAUF and PMCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMAUF
1D Price
Change %
CMAUF100%
+11.11%
PMCCF - CMAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLVRF - CMAUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+51.09%
CGDXF - CMAUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJIMF - CMAUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHKKF - CMAUF
0%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
More

PMCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCCF and CMAUF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCCF and CMAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCCF
1D Price
Change %
PMCCF100%
N/A
CMAUF - PMCCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RRDMF - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXNRF - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
PPTA - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.34%
GROY - PMCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.60%
More