Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECAZX
CMBFX vs ECAZX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECAZX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.46
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.48M
Eaton Vance AZ Municipal Income C
Price$9.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.26M
CMBFX vs ECAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECAZX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 286M vs. ECAZX (91.3M). ECAZX (2.57) and CMBFX (2.46) have matching dividends . CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECAZX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECAZX (20 years). ECAZX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ECAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECAZX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. ECAZX (-0.55). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.99 vs. ECAZX (-4.85).
| CMBFX | ECAZX | CMBFX / ECAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.48 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.48 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.628 | -1.584 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286M | 91.3M | 313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -0.55 | -367% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.06 | 2.87 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.99 | -4.85 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.98 | -0.31 | -4,887% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement