Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs EIMDX
CMBFX vs EIMDX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs EIMDX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.32M
Eaton Vance MD Municipal Income I
Price$8.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.45M
CMBFX vs EIMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. EIMDX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and EIMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. EIMDX (87.4M). EIMDX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: EIMDX (3.45) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than EIMDX: CMBFX (41 years) vs EIMDX (17 years). CMBFX (0.60) is less costly to investors than EIMDX (0.53). EIMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). CMBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EIMDX: CMBFX (2000) vs EIMDX (1000000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.17 vs. EIMDX (-0.39). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.02 vs. EIMDX (-1.74).
| CMBFX | EIMDX | CMBFX / EIMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.53 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.53 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.029 | -0.811 | -127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 87.4M | 328% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 3.45 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | -0.39 | -297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.85 | 4.21 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.02 | -1.74 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.51 | 2.63 | 552% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement