Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ETAZX
CMBFX vs ETAZX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETAZX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.46
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.48M
Eaton Vance AZ Municipal Income A
Price$8.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.26M
CMBFX vs ETAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETAZX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 286M vs. ETAZX (91.3M). ETAZX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETAZX (3.34) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETAZX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETAZX (32 years). ETAZX (0.73) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ETAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETAZX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. ETAZX (-0.07). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.99 vs. ETAZX (-2.46).
| CMBFX | ETAZX | CMBFX / ETAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.73 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.73 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.628 | -1.572 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286M | 91.3M | 313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.34 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | -0.07 | -2,774% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.06 | 4.56 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.99 | -2.46 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.98 | 3.02 | 495% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement