Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ETMDX
CMBFX vs ETMDX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETMDX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.38
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.23M
Eaton Vance MD Municipal Income A
Price$8.05
Change-$0.04 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.4M
CMBFX vs ETMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETMDX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 290M vs. ETMDX (89.4M). ETMDX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETMDX (3.17) vs CMBFX (2.45). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETMDX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETMDX (31 years). ETMDX (0.73) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ETMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETMDX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. ETMDX (0.79). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.62 vs. ETMDX (-0.30).
| CMBFX | ETMDX | CMBFX / ETMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.73 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.73 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.151 | -1.510 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 290M | 89.4M | 324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.17 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | 0.79 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.62 | 6.10 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.62 | -0.30 | -205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.57 | 1.05 | 1,391% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement