Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ETMDX
CMBFX vs ETMDX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ETMDX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.97M
Eaton Vance MD Municipal Income A
Price$8.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.08M
CMBFX vs ETMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ETMDX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ETMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. ETMDX (88.1M). ETMDX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ETMDX (3.21) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ETMDX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ETMDX (32 years). ETMDX (0.73) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ETMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ETMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ETMDX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.31 vs. ETMDX (-0.29). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.77 vs. ETMDX (-1.06).
| CMBFX | ETMDX | CMBFX / ETMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.73 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.73 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.157 | -1.485 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 88.1M | 326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.21 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.31 | -0.29 | -456% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.67 | 6.64 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.77 | -1.06 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.63 | 1.19 | 1,234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement