Ad is loading...
CMBFX vs VNDFX
CMBFX vs VNDFX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs VNDFX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.37
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.97M
Viking Tax-Free for North Dakota A
Price$8.56
Change+$0.04 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.93M
CMBFX vs VNDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. VNDFX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and VNDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 288M vs. VNDFX (16.9M). VNDFX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: VNDFX (3.11) vs CMBFX (2.42). CMBFX was incepted earlier than VNDFX: CMBFX (41 years) vs VNDFX (26 years). VNDFX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). VNDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.91 vs. CMBFX (13.00). VNDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: VNDFX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. VNDFX (-1.86). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.41 vs. VNDFX (-5.91).
| CMBFX | VNDFX | CMBFX / VNDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.98 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.30 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.792 | -2.300 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288M | 16.9M | 1,704% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 3.11 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | -1.86 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.84 | -1.82 | -267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.41 | -5.91 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.11 | 2.57 | 510% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...