Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs VNDFX
CMBFX vs VNDFX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs VNDFX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.97M
Viking Tax-Free for North Dakota A
Price$8.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.72M
CMBFX vs VNDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. VNDFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and VNDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. VNDFX (16.7M). VNDFX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: VNDFX (3.19) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than VNDFX: CMBFX (41 years) vs VNDFX (26 years). VNDFX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). VNDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.91 vs. CMBFX (13.00). VNDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: VNDFX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.40 vs. VNDFX (-2.15). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.69 vs. VNDFX (-7.64).
| CMBFX | VNDFX | CMBFX / VNDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.98 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.30 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.157 | -2.126 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 16.7M | 1,719% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.19 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.40 | -2.15 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.67 | 0.13 | 5,124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.69 | -7.64 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.72 | 3.35 | 440% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement