Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs VNDFX
CMBFX vs VNDFX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs VNDFX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.38
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.23M
Viking Tax-Free for North Dakota A
Price$8.53
Change-$0.03 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.25M
CMBFX vs VNDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. VNDFX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and VNDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 290M vs. VNDFX (17.2M). VNDFX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: VNDFX (3.16) vs CMBFX (2.45). CMBFX was incepted earlier than VNDFX: CMBFX (41 years) vs VNDFX (26 years). VNDFX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). VNDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.91 vs. CMBFX (13.00). VNDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: VNDFX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. VNDFX (-2.28). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.62 vs. VNDFX (-7.81).
| CMBFX | VNDFX | CMBFX / VNDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.98 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.30 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.151 | -2.382 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 290M | 17.2M | 1,686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.16 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | -2.28 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.62 | -0.31 | -2,169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.62 | -7.81 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.57 | 3.28 | 444% |