Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs WWTCX
CMBFX vs WWTCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs WWTCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.46
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.48M
Allspring Wisconsin Tax-Free C
Price$10.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.54M
CMBFX vs WWTCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. WWTCX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and WWTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 286M vs. WWTCX (131M). CMBFX pays higher dividends than WWTCX: CMBFX (2.46) vs WWTCX (2.11). CMBFX was incepted earlier than WWTCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs WWTCX (23 years). WWTCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). CMBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WWTCX (9.00). WWTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: WWTCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. WWTCX (1.21). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.99 vs. WWTCX (-1.82).
| CMBFX | WWTCX | CMBFX / WWTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.45 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.70 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.628 | -0.375 | -168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286M | 131M | 218% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.11 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.03 | 1.21 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.06 | 4.15 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.99 | -1.82 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.98 | 5.31 | 282% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement