Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs WWTFX
CMBFX vs WWTFX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs WWTFX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.32M
Allspring Wisconsin Tax-Free A
Price$10.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130M
CMBFX vs WWTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. WWTFX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and WWTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. WWTFX (130M). WWTFX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: WWTFX (2.92) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than WWTFX: CMBFX (41 years) vs WWTFX (17 years). WWTFX (0.95) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). CMBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WWTFX (9.00). WWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: WWTFX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.17 vs. WWTFX (0.76). WWTFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.39 vs. CMBFX (0.02).
| CMBFX | WWTFX | CMBFX / WWTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.70 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.95 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.029 | 0.374 | 275% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 130M | 221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.92 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | 0.76 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.85 | 5.03 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.02 | 0.39 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.51 | 10.69 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers