Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCAX vs PCLPX
CMCAX vs PCLPX Comparison
Open Charts CMCAX vs PCLPX
VanEck CM Commodity Index A
Price$67.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.33M
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I2
Price$6.49
Change-$0.03 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.7B
CMCAX vs PCLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCAX vs. PCLPX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCAX is a Hold and PCLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.7B vs. CMCAX (569M). PCLPX pays higher dividends than CMCAX: PCLPX (6.66) vs CMCAX (3.18). CMCAX was incepted earlier than PCLPX: CMCAX (15 years) vs PCLPX (15 years). CMCAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PCLPX (1.10). CMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLPX: CMCAX (1000) vs PCLPX (1000000). PCLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.41 vs. CMCAX (6.83). PCLPX return over 5 years is better than : 122.28 vs. CMCAX (81.52).
| CMCAX | PCLPX | CMCAX / PCLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.93 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.10 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.317 | 2.195 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 569M | 4.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 6.66 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.83 | 7.41 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.87 | 10.68 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.52 | 122.28 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.24 | 105.79 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement