Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMCAX vs PCLPX
CMCAX vs PCLPX Comparison
Open Charts CMCAX vs PCLPX
VanEck CM Commodity Index A
Price$66.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets559.41M
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy I2
Price$6.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.22B
CMCAX vs PCLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMCAX vs. PCLPX commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCAX is a Hold and PCLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLPX has more cash in the bank: 4.22B vs. CMCAX (559M). PCLPX pays higher dividends than CMCAX: PCLPX (8.84) vs CMCAX (3.29). CMCAX was incepted earlier than PCLPX: CMCAX (14 years) vs PCLPX (15 years). CMCAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PCLPX (1.10). CMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLPX: CMCAX (1000) vs PCLPX (1000000). CMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.09 vs. PCLPX (0.05). PCLPX return over 5 years is better than : 132.12 vs. CMCAX (92.87).
| CMCAX | PCLPX | CMCAX / PCLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.93 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.10 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.570 | -1.173 | -134% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 559M | 4.22B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 8.84 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | 0.05 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.82 | -7.45 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.87 | 132.12 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.79 | 69.26 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement