CMCXF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
12.52M
HWAUF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
15.96M
Ad is loading...

CMCXF vs HWAUF

Header iconCMCXF vs HWAUF Comparison
Open Charts CMCXF vs HWAUFBanner chart's image
CMC Metals
Price$0.01
Change-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization12.52M
Headwater Gold
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.5K
Capitalization15.96M
CMCXF vs HWAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMCXF vs. HWAUF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCXF is a Hold and HWAUF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CMCXF: $0.01 vs. HWAUF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CMCXF and HWAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMCXF: 1% vs. HWAUF: 22%
Market capitalization -- CMCXF: $12.52M vs. HWAUF: $15.96M
CMCXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.52M. HWAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMCXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HWAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMCXF is a better buy in the long-term than HWAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMCXF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWAUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMCXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HWAUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMCXF is a better buy in the short-term than HWAUF.

Price Growth

CMCXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.08% price change this week, while HWAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWAUF($16M) has a higher market cap than CMCXF($12.5M). CMCXF YTD gains are higher at: -3.548 vs. HWAUF (-8.833). HWAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -910.53K vs. CMCXF (-4.41M). HWAUF has more cash in the bank: 3.96M vs. CMCXF (1.73M). CMCXF has less debt than HWAUF: CMCXF (35.5K) vs HWAUF (323K). CMCXF (0) and HWAUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CMCXFHWAUFCMCXF / HWAUF
Capitalization12.5M16M78%
EBITDA-4.41M-910.53K485%
Gain YTD-3.548-8.83340%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.73M3.96M44%
Total Debt35.5K323K11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMCXF: Fundamental Ratings
CMCXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMCXFHWAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
90%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPIAX63.100.62
+0.99%
Invesco S&P 500 Index A
BVEFX20.330.14
+0.69%
Becker Value Equity Retail
VEMIX27.720.17
+0.62%
Vanguard Emerging Mkts Stock Idx Instl
EPLMX21.500.10
+0.47%
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield SIMPLE Cl
RETTX28.78N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs M

CMCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMCXF and VLCJF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMCXF and VLCJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMCXF
1D Price
Change %
CMCXF100%
-17.86%
VLCJF - CMCXF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BELGF - CMCXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
HWAUF - CMCXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
SAPLF - CMCXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLRMF - CMCXF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.63%
More

HWAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWAUF and SSVFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWAUF and SSVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWAUF
1D Price
Change %
HWAUF100%
-4.04%
SSVFF - HWAUF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
NFGC - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
APGOF - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
GFI - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
DDEJF - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+8.93%
More