Ad is loading...
CMCXF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
VLCJF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 30 closing price
Ad is loading...

CMCXF vs VLCJF

Header iconCMCXF vs VLCJF Comparison
Open Charts CMCXF vs VLCJFBanner chart's image
CMC Metals
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$61K
CapitalizationN/A
Velocity Minerals
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
CMCXF vs VLCJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMCXF vs. VLCJF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCXF is a Hold and VLCJF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CMCXF: $0.01 vs. VLCJF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: CMCXF and VLCJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMCXF: 47% vs. VLCJF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CMCXF: $12.52M vs. VLCJF: $13.79M
CMCXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.52M. VLCJF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMCXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLCJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMCXF and VLCJF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

CMCXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -17.13% price change this week, while VLCJF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLCJF($13.8M) has a higher market cap than CMCXF($12.5M). VLCJF YTD gains are higher at: 40.977 vs. CMCXF (-37.759). VLCJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.47M vs. CMCXF (-4.41M). VLCJF has more cash in the bank: 1.85M vs. CMCXF (1.73M). CMCXF has less debt than VLCJF: CMCXF (35.5K) vs VLCJF (237K). CMCXF (0) and VLCJF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CMCXFVLCJFCMCXF / VLCJF
Capitalization12.5M13.8M91%
EBITDA-4.41M-2.47M179%
Gain YTD-37.75940.977-92%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.73M1.85M94%
Total Debt35.5K237K15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMCXF vs VLCJF: Fundamental Ratings
CMCXF
VLCJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9789
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
19n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLCJF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CMCXF (68). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to CMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CMCXF (100). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to CMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CMCXF (97). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to CMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

VLCJF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CMCXF (62). This means that VLCJF’s stock grew similarly to CMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCXF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VLCJF (100). This means that CMCXF’s stock grew significantly faster than VLCJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YINN27.670.40
+1.47%
Direxion Daily FTSE China Bull 3X ETF
ALTY11.85-0.05
-0.38%
Global X Alternative Income ETF
SOCL41.24-0.21
-0.51%
Global X Social Media ETF
TINT30.65-0.29
-0.93%
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
IDHQ28.71-0.36
-1.24%
Invesco S&P International Dev Qual ETF

CMCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMCXF and VLCJF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMCXF and VLCJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMCXF
1D Price
Change %
CMCXF100%
+6.23%
VLCJF - CMCXF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BELGF - CMCXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HWAUF - CMCXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
SAPLF - CMCXF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLRMF - CMCXF
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.53%
More

VLCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLCJF and AUMN have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLCJF and AUMN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLCJF
1D Price
Change %
VLCJF100%
N/A
AUMN - VLCJF
33%
Poorly correlated
-9.33%
CMCXF - VLCJF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.23%
EGMCF - VLCJF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.94%
ZMPLF - VLCJF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGMIF - VLCJF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More