Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs RGAHX
CMLIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs RGAHX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$47.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets539.21M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$75.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.73B
CMLIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 302B vs. CMLIX (539M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: RGAHX (0.50) vs CMLIX (0.07). CMLIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: CMLIX (97 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). CMLIX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: RGAHX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.47 vs. CMLIX (4.91). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 47.36 vs. CMLIX (39.85).
| CMLIX | RGAHX | CMLIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.44 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.44 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 97 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.491 | 3.350 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 539M | 302B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.50 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.91 | 9.47 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.83 | 35.90 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.85 | 47.36 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement