Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs RGAHX
CMLIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs RGAHX
Congress Large Cap Growth Institutional
Price$49.49
Change-$0.12 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets565.9M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$82.15
Change+$0.42 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.6B
CMLIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. CMLIX (566M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than CMLIX: RGAHX (0.47) vs CMLIX (0.07). CMLIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: CMLIX (97 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). CMLIX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CMLIX (19.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: RGAHX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. CMLIX (2.40). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 45.60 vs. CMLIX (37.57).
| CMLIX | RGAHX | CMLIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.44 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.44 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 97 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.982 | 11.860 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 566M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.47 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.40 | 10.51 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.85 | 59.41 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.57 | 45.60 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement