CMLS
Price
$0.79
Change
-$0.03 (-3.66%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.79M
29 days until earnings call
EMMS
Price
$3.25
Change
+$0.95 (+41.30%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Capitalization
30.15M
Ad is loading...

CMLS vs EMMS

Header iconCMLS vs EMMS Comparison
Open Charts CMLS vs EMMSBanner chart's image
Cumulus Media
Price$0.79
Change-$0.03 (-3.66%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization12.79M
Emmis
Price$3.25
Change+$0.95 (+41.30%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization30.15M
CMLS vs EMMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMLS vs. EMMS commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLS is a Hold and EMMS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CMLS: $0.82 vs. EMMS: $3.25)
Brand notoriety: CMLS and EMMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Broadcasting industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMLS: 36% vs. EMMS: 66%
Market capitalization -- CMLS: $13.86M vs. EMMS: $30.15M
CMLS [@Broadcasting] is valued at $13.86M. EMMS’s [@Broadcasting] market capitalization is $30.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Broadcasting] industry ranges from $18.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Broadcasting] industry is $1.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEMMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EMMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMMS is a better buy in the long-term than CMLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMMS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EMMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EMMS is a better buy in the short-term than CMLS.

Price Growth

CMLS (@Broadcasting) experienced а +1.85% price change this week, while EMMS (@Broadcasting) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was +1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +137237.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMLS is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

EMMS is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Broadcasting (+1.57% weekly)

Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMMS($30.1M) has a higher market cap than CMLS($12.8M). CMLS YTD gains are higher at: 21.761 vs. EMMS (0.000). CMLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.13M vs. EMMS (-29.16M). EMMS has less debt than CMLS: EMMS (65.5M) vs CMLS (798M). CMLS has higher revenues than EMMS: CMLS (830M) vs EMMS (39.7M).
CMLSEMMSCMLS / EMMS
Capitalization12.8M30.1M43%
EBITDA-1.13M-29.16M4%
Gain YTD21.7610.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue830M39.7M2,091%
Total Cash52.2MN/A-
Total Debt798M65.5M1,218%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMLS vs EMMS: Fundamental Ratings
CMLS
EMMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
527
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9719
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6585
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9994
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMMS's Valuation (44) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as CMLS (52). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to CMLS’s over the last 12 months.

EMMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as CMLS (100). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to CMLS’s over the last 12 months.

EMMS's SMR Rating (19) in the Broadcasting industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMLS (97). This means that EMMS’s stock grew significantly faster than CMLS’s over the last 12 months.

CMLS's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as EMMS (85). This means that CMLS’s stock grew similarly to EMMS’s over the last 12 months.

EMMS's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as CMLS (99). This means that EMMS’s stock grew similarly to CMLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMLSEMMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EASG30.190.63
+2.13%
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Eq ETF
IYR95.651.79
+1.91%
iShares US Real Estate ETF
KBA23.000.23
+0.99%
KraneShares Bosera MSCIChinaA50CntIdETF
FDRR52.560.39
+0.75%
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
EVMT15.06-0.10
-0.66%
Invesco Elctc vhcl Mtls Cmd StgyNoK-1ETF

CMLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMLS and TGNA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMLS and TGNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMLS
1D Price
Change %
CMLS100%
-2.88%
TGNA - CMLS
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
IHRT - CMLS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
FUBO - CMLS
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
GTN - CMLS
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
SBGI - CMLS
18%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
More

EMMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMMS and SALM have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMMS and SALM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMMS
1D Price
Change %
EMMS100%
N/A
SALM - EMMS
10%
Poorly correlated
+19.06%
CMLS - EMMS
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
SGA - EMMS
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
GTN - EMMS
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
BBGI - EMMS
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.39%
More