CMLS
Price
$0.72
Change
-$0.03 (-4.00%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
64 days until earnings call
GTN
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.02 (-0.61%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMLS vs GTN

Header iconCMLS vs GTN Comparison
Open Charts CMLS vs GTNBanner chart's image
Cumulus Media
Price$0.72
Change-$0.03 (-4.00%)
Volume$129
CapitalizationN/A
Gray Television
Price$3.27
Change-$0.02 (-0.61%)
Volume$21.21K
CapitalizationN/A
CMLS vs GTN Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMLS vs. GTN commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLS is a Hold and GTN is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CMLS: $0.75 vs. GTN: $3.29)
Brand notoriety: CMLS and GTN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Broadcasting industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMLS: 48% vs. GTN: 199%
Market capitalization -- CMLS: $12.74M vs. GTN: $354.43M
CMLS [@Broadcasting] is valued at $12.74M. GTN’s [@Broadcasting] market capitalization is $354.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Broadcasting] industry ranges from $18.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Broadcasting] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTN is a better buy in the long-term than CMLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GTN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMLS is a better buy in the short-term than GTN.

Price Growth

CMLS (@Broadcasting) experienced а -7.40% price change this week, while GTN (@Broadcasting) price change was -23.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7916682.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

GTN is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Broadcasting (-2.69% weekly)

Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTN($353M) has a higher market cap than CMLS($12.2M). GTN YTD gains are higher at: -60.727 vs. CMLS (-85.902). GTN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. CMLS (-1.13M). GTN has more cash in the bank: 69M vs. CMLS (52.2M). CMLS has less debt than GTN: CMLS (798M) vs GTN (5.97B). GTN has higher revenues than CMLS: GTN (3.46B) vs CMLS (830M).
CMLSGTNCMLS / GTN
Capitalization12.2M353M3%
EBITDA-1.13M1.06B-0%
Gain YTD-85.902-60.727141%
P/E RatioN/A2.18-
Revenue830M3.46B24%
Total Cash52.2M69M76%
Total Debt798M5.97B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMLS vs GTN: Fundamental Ratings
CMLS
GTN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5353
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9778
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6590
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a3

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTN's Valuation (4) in the Broadcasting industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMLS (51). This means that GTN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMLS’s over the last 12 months.

GTN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as CMLS (100). This means that GTN’s stock grew similarly to CMLS’s over the last 12 months.

GTN's SMR Rating (78) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as CMLS (97). This means that GTN’s stock grew similarly to CMLS’s over the last 12 months.

CMLS's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as GTN (90). This means that CMLS’s stock grew similarly to GTN’s over the last 12 months.

CMLS's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as GTN (100). This means that CMLS’s stock grew similarly to GTN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMLSGTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMCAX13.38N/A
N/A
RBC SMID Cap Growth A
LMOPX34.21-0.17
-0.49%
Patient Opportunity C
HLRRX11.58-0.07
-0.60%
LDR Real Estate Value Opportunity Instl
RPMFX17.39-0.15
-0.86%
Reinhart Genesis PMV Advisor
OEGNX25.84-0.36
-1.37%
Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth R

CMLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMLS and TGNA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMLS and TGNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMLS
1D Price
Change %
CMLS100%
-1.45%
TGNA - CMLS
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
IHRT - CMLS
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.50%
FUBO - CMLS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTN - CMLS
18%
Poorly correlated
-6.27%
ITVPY - CMLS
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
More

GTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTN has been closely correlated with NXST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTN jumps, then NXST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTN
1D Price
Change %
GTN100%
-6.27%
NXST - GTN
77%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
SBGI - GTN
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
TGNA - GTN
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
SSP - GTN
50%
Loosely correlated
-5.14%
FUBO - GTN
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More