CMLS vs ITVPY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLS is a Hold and ITVPY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileITVPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ITVPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITVPY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- ITVPY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CMLS (@Broadcasting) experienced а -7.40% price change this week, while ITVPY (@Broadcasting) price change was -2.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7916682.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Broadcasting (-2.69% weekly)Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.
| CMLS | ITVPY | CMLS / ITVPY | |
| Capitalization | 12.2M | 3.42B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -1.13M | 593M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -85.902 | 20.242 | -424% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 6.51 | - |
| Revenue | 830M | 3.58B | 23% |
| Total Cash | 52.2M | 354M | 15% |
| Total Debt | 798M | 852M | 94% |
CMLS | ITVPY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ITVPY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMLS (51) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that ITVPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMLS’s over the last 12 months.
ITVPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CMLS (100) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that ITVPY’s stock grew similarly to CMLS’s over the last 12 months.
ITVPY's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMLS (97) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that ITVPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMLS’s over the last 12 months.
ITVPY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CMLS (65) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that ITVPY’s stock grew similarly to CMLS’s over the last 12 months.
ITVPY's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CMLS (99) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that ITVPY’s stock grew similarly to CMLS’s over the last 12 months.
| CMLS | ITVPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 69% |
CMLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CMLS and TGNA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMLS and TGNA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMLS | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| TGNA - CMLS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
| IHRT - CMLS | 21% Poorly correlated | -5.50% | ||
| FUBO - CMLS | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GTN - CMLS | 18% Poorly correlated | -6.27% | ||
| ITVPY - CMLS | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.05% | ||
More | ||||
ITVPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ITVPY and NXST have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITVPY and NXST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITVPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITVPY | 100% | -2.05% | ||
| NXST - ITVPY | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
| TGNA - ITVPY | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
| PBSFY - ITVPY | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.32% | ||
| GTN - ITVPY | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.27% | ||
| UONEK - ITVPY | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
More | ||||