Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs QDARX
CMNIX vs QDARX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. QDARX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Buy and QDARX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 15.9B vs. QDARX (1.85B). CMNIX pays higher dividends than QDARX: CMNIX (1.96) vs QDARX (1.28). CMNIX was incepted earlier than QDARX: CMNIX (25 years) vs QDARX (11 years). QDARX (1.78) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (0.97). QDARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 361.00 vs. CMNIX (35.00). CMNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than QDARX: CMNIX (1000000) vs QDARX (50000000). CMNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.20 vs. QDARX (6.41). QDARX return over 5 years is better than : 49.76 vs. CMNIX (22.64).
| CMNIX | QDARX | CMNIX / QDARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.77 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.78 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.579 | 3.799 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.9B | 1.85B | 862% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 1.28 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 6.41 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.44 | 13.04 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.64 | 49.76 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.00 | 74.08 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers