Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs QDARX
CMNIX vs QDARX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. QDARX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Buy and QDARX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. QDARX (1.86B). CMNIX pays higher dividends than QDARX: CMNIX (1.94) vs QDARX (1.27). CMNIX was incepted earlier than QDARX: CMNIX (25 years) vs QDARX (11 years). QDARX (1.78) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (0.97). QDARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 361.00 vs. CMNIX (35.00). CMNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than QDARX: CMNIX (1000000) vs QDARX (50000000). QDARX (7.43) and CMNIX (7.18) have marching annual gain over last year. QDARX return over 5 years is better than : 45.74 vs. CMNIX (21.82).
| CMNIX | QDARX | CMNIX / QDARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.77 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.78 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.049 | 4.624 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 50000000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 1.86B | 860% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.27 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | 7.43 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.70 | 14.93 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.82 | 45.74 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.12 | 75.81 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement