Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNZX vs FJMNX
CMNZX vs FJMNX Comparison
Open Charts CMNZX vs FJMNX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt Inst
Price$18.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.5M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond A
Price$10.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
CMNZX vs FJMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNZX vs. FJMNX commentary
Jun 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNZX is a Hold and FJMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJMNX has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. CMNZX (474M). FJMNX (3.61) and CMNZX (3.52) have matching dividends . CMNZX was incepted earlier than FJMNX: CMNZX (15 years) vs FJMNX (37 years). FJMNX (0.79) is less costly to investors than CMNZX (0.56). FJMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. CMNZX (10.00). CMNZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FJMNX: CMNZX (2000) vs FJMNX (2500). FJMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.07 vs. CMNZX (-0.65). FJMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.65 vs. CMNZX (-1.75).
| CMNZX | FJMNX | CMNZX / FJMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.79 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.79 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.243 | -1.635 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 646M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 3.61 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | -0.07 | 887% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.18 | 7.60 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.75 | 0.65 | -271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.36 | 18.60 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement