Ad is loading...
CMNZX vs FJMNX
CMNZX vs FJMNX Comparison
Open Charts CMNZX vs FJMNX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt Inst
Price$18.93
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets472.86M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond A
Price$10.46
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
CMNZX vs FJMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNZX vs. FJMNX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNZX is a Hold and FJMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJMNX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. CMNZX (473M). FJMNX (3.59) and CMNZX (3.49) have matching dividends . CMNZX was incepted earlier than FJMNX: CMNZX (15 years) vs FJMNX (37 years). FJMNX (0.79) is less costly to investors than CMNZX (0.56). FJMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. CMNZX (10.00). CMNZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FJMNX: CMNZX (2000) vs FJMNX (2500). CMNZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.74 vs. FJMNX (0.68). FJMNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.10 vs. CMNZX (0.89).
| CMNZX | FJMNX | CMNZX / FJMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.79 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.79 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.179 | -1.646 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 653M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 3.59 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.74 | 0.68 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.92 | 6.69 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.89 | 3.10 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.59 | 18.54 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...