Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNZX vs IMNTX
CMNZX vs IMNTX Comparison
Open Charts CMNZX vs IMNTX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt Inst
Price$18.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets475.07M
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt A
Price$18.77
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets475.07M
CMNZX vs IMNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNZX vs. IMNTX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNZX is a Hold and IMNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNZX (475M) and IMNTX (475M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CMNZX pays higher dividends than IMNTX: CMNZX (3.52) vs IMNTX (3.26). CMNZX was incepted earlier than IMNTX: CMNZX (15 years) vs IMNTX (39 years). IMNTX (0.81) is less costly to investors than CMNZX (0.56). CMNZX (10.00) and IMNTX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. CMNZX (2000) and IMNTX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMNZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. IMNTX (-0.14). CMNZX return over 5 years is better than : -1.20 vs. IMNTX (-2.36).
| CMNZX | IMNTX | CMNZX / IMNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.81 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.81 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.398 | -2.498 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 475M | 475M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 3.26 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | -0.14 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.37 | 1.60 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.20 | -2.36 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.18 | 12.39 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement