Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNZX vs NTCCX
CMNZX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts CMNZX vs NTCCX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt Inst
Price$18.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.96M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.38
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
CMNZX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNZX vs. NTCCX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNZX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. CMNZX (474M). CMNZX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: CMNZX (3.52) vs NTCCX (2.77). CMNZX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: CMNZX (15 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than CMNZX (0.56). NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. CMNZX (10.00). CMNZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: CMNZX (2000) vs NTCCX (2500). CMNZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. NTCCX (-0.53). CMNZX return over 5 years is better than : -1.20 vs. NTCCX (-2.94).
| CMNZX | NTCCX | CMNZX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.59 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.59 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.398 | -2.061 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 646M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 2.77 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | -0.53 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.37 | 1.41 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.20 | -2.94 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.18 | 10.36 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement