Ad is loading...
CMNZX vs NTCCX
CMNZX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts CMNZX vs NTCCX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt Inst
Price$18.93
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets472.86M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
CMNZX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNZX vs. NTCCX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNZX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. CMNZX (473M). CMNZX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: CMNZX (3.49) vs NTCCX (2.75). CMNZX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: CMNZX (15 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than CMNZX (0.56). NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. CMNZX (10.00). CMNZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: CMNZX (2000) vs NTCCX (2500). CMNZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.74 vs. NTCCX (0.14). CMNZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.89 vs. NTCCX (-0.44).
| CMNZX | NTCCX | CMNZX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.59 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.59 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.179 | -1.629 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 653M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 2.75 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.74 | 0.14 | 533% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.92 | 4.43 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.89 | -0.44 | -205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.59 | 10.55 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...