Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNZX vs RMTCX
CMNZX vs RMTCX Comparison
Open Charts CMNZX vs RMTCX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt Inst
Price$18.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets475.07M
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt C
Price$18.77
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets475.07M
CMNZX vs RMTCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNZX vs. RMTCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNZX is a Hold and RMTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNZX (475M) and RMTCX (475M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CMNZX pays higher dividends than RMTCX: CMNZX (3.52) vs RMTCX (2.48). CMNZX was incepted earlier than RMTCX: CMNZX (15 years) vs RMTCX (25 years). RMTCX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CMNZX (0.56). CMNZX (10.00) and RMTCX (10.00) have comparable annual turnover. CMNZX (2000) and RMTCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CMNZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. RMTCX (-0.89). CMNZX return over 5 years is better than : -1.20 vs. RMTCX (-5.91).
| CMNZX | RMTCX | CMNZX / RMTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.56 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.56 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.398 | -2.802 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 475M | 475M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 2.48 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | -0.89 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.37 | -0.67 | -353% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.20 | -5.91 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.18 | 4.26 | 333% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement