Advertisement
CMPO vs MUR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMPO is a StrongBuy and MUR is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMPO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMUR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MUR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMPO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MUR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CMPO (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +0.66% price change this week, while MUR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.10%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMPO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
MUR is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (+1.43% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
@Oil & Gas Production (+1.70% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| CMPO | MUR | CMPO / MUR | |
| Capitalization | 1.4B | 7.08B | 20% |
| EBITDA | -51.63M | 1.9B | -3% |
| Gain YTD | 5.858 | -26.936 | -22% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.71 | 10.98 | 125% |
| Revenue | 421M | 3.45B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 77.5M | 317M | 24% |
| Total Debt | 202M | 2.09B | 10% |
MUR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CMPO | MUR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IDV | 34.28 | 0.22 | +0.65% |
| iShares International Select Div ETF | |||
| BBLB | 81.94 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd20+YrETF | |||
| DFSI | 39.03 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| Dimensional International Sstby Cr 1 ETF | |||
| HERD | 38.99 | -0.07 | -0.18% |
| Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | |||
| PPIE | 26.25 | -0.06 | -0.23% |
| Putnam PanAgora ESG Intl Eq ETF | |||
CMPO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMPO has been loosely correlated with CRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMPO jumps, then CRS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMPO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMPO | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRS - CMPO | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| ATI - CMPO | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ZEUS - CMPO | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| MT - CMPO | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ESAB - CMPO | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||
MUR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUR has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUR jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MUR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUR | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| OVV - MUR | 88% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| CHRD - MUR | 88% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| MGY - MUR | 88% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| MTDR - MUR | 87% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| DVN - MUR | 86% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||