Ad is loading...
CMRAX vs HMEAX
CMRAX vs HMEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMRAX vs. HMEAX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMRAX is a Hold and HMEAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMEAX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. CMRAX (1.93M). HMEAX pays higher dividends than CMRAX: HMEAX (4.84) vs CMRAX (1.14). CMRAX was incepted earlier than HMEAX: CMRAX (2 years) vs HMEAX (9 years). CMRAX (12.56) is less costly to investors than HMEAX (2.74). HMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 556.00 vs. CMRAX (136.00). HMEAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CMRAX (3%) vs CMRAX (3%). CMRAX (2500) and HMEAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.02 vs. CMRAX (-3.36).
| CMRAX | HMEAX | CMRAX / HMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 2.49 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 12.56 | 2.74 | 458% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.665 | 0.324 | -1,440% |
| Front Load | 3% | 6% | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93M | 1.03B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 4.84 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.36 | 4.02 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 12.28 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 18.08 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | -64.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...