Advertisement
CMS vs ED
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) vs. Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CMS and ED are regulated utilities offering defensive appeal with low betas (a measure of stock volatility relative to the market) of 0.37 and 0.29, respectively, and dividend yields around 3%.
- CMS recently reported strong Q1 earnings, beating estimates with adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $1.13 and raising full-year guidance amid robust power demand.
- ED shows stronger YTD performance at 12.12% versus CMS's 9.54%, supported by its larger market cap of $40.7B compared to $23.5B.
- Analyst consensus leans toward Moderate Buy for CMS with a $82 average target (upside potential), while ED holds a Hold rating near current levels.
- Relative performance highlights CMS's edge in recent momentum and valuation at a P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of 21 versus ED's 19.6, amid sector tailwinds.
Introduction
This stock comparison between CMS Energy Corporation and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) examines two leading regulated utilities in a market favoring defensive sectors. Both companies provide essential electric and gas services, attracting income-focused investors and traders seeking stability amid volatility. With interest rate sensitivity and growing power demand from data centers and electrification, their relative performance offers insights into sector positioning. Traders may eye short-term momentum, while long-term investors prioritize dividends and growth prospects in this CMS vs. ED analysis.
CMS Overview and Recent Performance
CMS Energy Corporation, based in Michigan, operates through its subsidiary Consumers Energy, delivering electricity and natural gas to over 6 million customers. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $76, within a 52-week range of $67.71 to $80.36, reflecting resilience in the utilities sector. Strong Q1 results showed adjusted EPS of $1.13, surpassing estimates, driven by higher power demand and operational efficiency, prompting raised full-year guidance to $3.83–$3.90. Sentiment has improved on these beats and analyst upgrades, with YTD gains of 9.54% and a low beta underscoring its defensive nature. Recent weeks' price behavior indicates modest pullbacks but underlying stability amid broader economic pressures.
ED Overview and Recent Performance
Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED), serving New York and surrounding areas, provides electric, gas, and steam services to millions via subsidiaries like Con Edison of New York. The stock hovers near $110, in a 52-week range of $94.96 to $116.23, with YTD returns of 12.12% outpacing peers in recent months. Anticipation builds for upcoming Q1 earnings, projecting EPS growth, bolstered by steady demand and a recent dividend declaration of $0.887 per share. Market sentiment remains supported by its dividend aristocrat status and ultra-low beta of 0.29, though shares have shown limited upside recently. Performance reflects reliable cash flows despite regulatory and weather-related challenges in recent market activity.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots, curated for current market conditions across thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML trend signals, take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., 3%/2%), and multi-agent systems, with impressive stats: annualized returns from 23% to 163%, win rates of 51%–88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios reaching 17. Timeframes range from 5-minute to 49-day holds, targeting sectors like semiconductors and industrials. Explore these high-performing options to align with your trading style and enhance decision-making in volatile markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CMS and ED operate regulated utility models focused on transmission and distribution, minimizing competition but exposing them to rate cases and weather risks. CMS emphasizes Michigan's industrial growth drivers like manufacturing resurgence, contrasting ED's denser urban New York base with higher steam operations. Recent momentum favors CMS post-earnings, while ED leads YTD on scale. Risk profiles are similar—low betas—but ED's larger cap offers more liquidity. Sector exposure is nearly identical, yet CMS shows better analyst sentiment and relative valuation trade-offs in power demand tailwinds.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CMS based on trend consistency from recent earnings beats, raised guidance, and greater upside to analyst targets around $82 from $76 levels. ED provides superior stability and YTD gains, but lacks near-term catalysts. This probabilistic edge favors CMS for momentum traders in the current environment, though both suit defensive portfolios.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMS is a Hold and ED is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileED’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ED’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- ED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CMS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.40% price change this week, while ED (@Electric Utilities) price change was -2.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
CMS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
ED is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-0.28% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| CMS | ED | CMS / ED | |
| Capitalization | 22.6B | 39.4B | 57% |
| EBITDA | 3.4B | 6.35B | 54% |
| Gain YTD | 6.438 | 8.477 | 76% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.28 | 18.03 | 112% |
| Revenue | 8.82B | 17.2B | 51% |
| Total Cash | 175M | 147M | 119% |
| Total Debt | 19.1B | 27.2B | 70% |
CMS | ED | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ED's Valuation (57) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (64). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (47). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's SMR Rating (62) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (75). This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CMS (59). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to CMS’s over the last 12 months.
CMS's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (57). This means that CMS’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
| CMS | ED | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 2 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 2 days ago 37% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 22% | 2 days ago 24% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ARB | 29.71 | 0.27 | +0.92% |
| AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF | |||
| MDEV | 18.26 | 0.16 | +0.90% |
| First Trust Indxx Global Mdcl Dvcs ETF | |||
| FDHY | 49.15 | -0.08 | -0.16% |
| Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF | |||
| PLOO | 13.78 | -0.09 | -0.65% |
| Leverage Shares 2x Cpd Acclrtd PLTRMnETF | |||
| GSIE | 45.46 | -0.33 | -0.72% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF | |||
ED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.