Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMTFX vs SCIRX
CMTFX vs SCIRX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs SCIRX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$101.84
Change+$0.96 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.93B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info R
Price$117.78
Change+$0.10 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.56B
CMTFX vs SCIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. SCIRX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a Buy and SCIRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCIRX has more cash in the bank: 14.6B vs. CMTFX (3.93B). CMTFX (0.00) and SCIRX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than SCIRX: CMTFX (25 years) vs SCIRX (22 years). SCIRX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CMTFX (0.92). SCIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CMTFX (7.00). SCIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMTFX: SCIRX (0) vs CMTFX (2000). CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.00 vs. SCIRX (-3.64). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 106.59 vs. SCIRX (44.53).
| CMTFX | SCIRX | CMTFX / SCIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.43 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.43 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.227 | 5.818 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.93B | 14.6B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.00 | -3.64 | -302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.39 | 34.35 | 286% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.59 | 44.53 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 398.42 | 100.75 | 395% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers