Ad is loading...
CMTFX vs SCIRX
CMTFX vs SCIRX Comparison
Open Charts CMTFX vs SCIRX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst
Price$70.80
Change-$1.23 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.83B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info R
Price$83.88
Change-$1.74 (-2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.76B
CMTFX vs SCIRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMTFX vs. SCIRX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMTFX is a Hold and SCIRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCIRX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. CMTFX (2.83B). CMTFX (0.00) and SCIRX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMTFX was incepted earlier than SCIRX: CMTFX (24 years) vs SCIRX (22 years). SCIRX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CMTFX (0.92). SCIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. CMTFX (7.00). SCIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMTFX: SCIRX (0) vs CMTFX (2000). CMTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.88 vs. SCIRX (-21.98). CMTFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.60 vs. SCIRX (32.05).
| CMTFX | SCIRX | CMTFX / SCIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.43 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.43 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -21.296 | -23.011 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.83B | 10.8B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.88 | -21.98 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.30 | -15.55 | -118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.60 | 32.05 | 280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 265.45 | 49.84 | 533% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...