CNA
Price
$48.43
Change
+$0.06 (+0.12%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
12.3B
85 days until earnings call
EG
Price
$348.04
Change
+$0.83 (+0.24%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
17.24B
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNA vs EG

Header iconCNA vs EG Comparison
Open Charts CNA vs EGBanner chart's image
CNA Financial
Price$48.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.12%)
Volume$198.54K
Capitalization12.3B
Everest Group
Price$348.04
Change+$0.83 (+0.24%)
Volume$325.17K
Capitalization17.24B
CNA vs EG Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNA vs. EG commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNA is a Buy and EG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CNA: $48.43 vs. EG: $348.04)
Brand notoriety: CNA and EG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNA: 49% vs. EG: 78%
Market capitalization -- CNA: $12.3B vs. EG: $17.24B
CNA [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $12.3B. EG’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $17.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • EG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNA is a better buy in the long-term than EG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNA is a better buy in the short-term than EG.

Price Growth

CNA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while EG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNA is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

EG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+2.48% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EG($17.2B) has a higher market cap than CNA($12.3B). CNA has higher P/E ratio than EG: CNA (10.10) vs EG (6.61). CNA YTD gains are higher at: 5.392 vs. EG (-3.440). CNA has more cash in the bank: 42.9B vs. EG (31.3B). CNA has less debt than EG: CNA (3.03B) vs EG (3.39B). EG has higher revenues than CNA: EG (14.5B) vs CNA (13.1B).
CNAEGCNA / EG
Capitalization12.3B17.2B72%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.392-3.440-157%
P/E Ratio10.106.61153%
Revenue13.1B14.5B90%
Total Cash42.9B31.3B137%
Total Debt3.03B3.39B90%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNA vs EG: Fundamental Ratings
CNA
EG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
956
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
913
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
154
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNA's Valuation (25) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as EG (37) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to EG’s over the last 12 months.

CNA's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as EG (13) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to EG’s over the last 12 months.

CNA's SMR Rating (95) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as EG (95) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to EG’s over the last 12 months.

CNA's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as EG (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that CNA’s stock grew similarly to EG’s over the last 12 months.

EG's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CNA (15) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that EG’s stock grew similarly to CNA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNAEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEFA79.900.42
+0.53%
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
UST42.580.15
+0.35%
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
IPO40.850.09
+0.21%
Renaissance IPO ETF
DMAR37.84-0.01
-0.02%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Mar
TMFC57.67-0.06
-0.10%
Motley Fool 100 ETF

EG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EG has been closely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EG jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EG
1D Price
Change %
EG100%
+0.24%
AXS - EG
74%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
RNR - EG
72%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
L - EG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
HIG - EG
69%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
CINF - EG
66%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
More