CNF
Price
$0.71
Change
-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Updated
May 14, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
139.22M
8 days until earnings call
PT
Price
$0.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 14, 04:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.38M
Ad is loading...

CNF vs PT

Header iconCNF vs PT Comparison
Open Charts CNF vs PTBanner chart's image
CNFinance Holdings
Price$0.71
Change-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization139.22M
Pintec Technology Holdings
Price$0.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$456
Capitalization17.38M
CNF vs PT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNF vs. PT commentary
May 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNF is a Buy and PT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 15, 2025
Stock price -- (CNF: $0.72 vs. PT: $0.93)
Brand notoriety: CNF and PT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNF: 9% vs. PT: 36%
Market capitalization -- CNF: $139.22M vs. PT: $17.38M
CNF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $139.22M. PT’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $17.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNF is a better buy in the long-term than PT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNF is a better buy in the short-term than PT.

Price Growth

CNF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -8.09% price change this week, while PT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNF is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.

PT is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.23% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNF($139M) has a higher market cap than PT($17.4M). PT YTD gains are higher at: 3.632 vs. CNF (-24.316). PT has less debt than CNF: PT (400M) vs CNF (6.84B). CNF has higher revenues than PT: CNF (1.19B) vs PT (173M).
CNFPTCNF / PT
Capitalization139M17.4M799%
EBITDAN/A-57.14M-
Gain YTD-24.3163.632-669%
P/E Ratio6.02N/A-
Revenue1.19B173M690%
Total CashN/A231M-
Total Debt6.84B400M1,709%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNF vs PT: Fundamental Ratings
CNF
PT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2859
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
504

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PT's Valuation (41) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNF (60) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew similarly to CNF’s over the last 12 months.

PT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNF (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew similarly to CNF’s over the last 12 months.

CNF's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PT (99) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNF’s stock grew significantly faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.

PT's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNF (65) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew similarly to CNF’s over the last 12 months.

CNF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNF’s stock grew significantly faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNFPT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSTAX101.91N/A
N/A
Hartford Stock HLS IA
SMYIX25.01N/A
N/A
Franklin Global Equity I
AFCNX17.82N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Intl Gr Inv
NIORX13.96N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Intl Small Cap R6
BROAX21.06N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage International Inv A

CNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNF and YRD have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNF and YRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNF
1D Price
Change %
CNF100%
+1.27%
YRD - CNF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
GHI - CNF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
LU - CNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
LX - CNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
PT - CNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
More