Ad is loading...
CNGKY
Price
$8.17
Change
+$0.04 (+0.49%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
MBHCF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 5 closing price
Ad is loading...

CNGKY vs MBHCF

Header iconCNGKY vs MBHCF Comparison
Open Charts CNGKY vs MBHCFBanner chart's image
CK Asset
Price$8.17
Change+$0.04 (+0.49%)
Volume$1.14K
CapitalizationN/A
MBH
Price$1.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CNGKY vs MBHCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNGKY vs. MBHCF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNGKY is a Hold and MBHCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CNGKY: $8.17 vs. MBHCF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: CNGKY and MBHCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNGKY: 31% vs. MBHCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CNGKY: $20.56B vs. MBHCF: $9.12M
CNGKY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $20.56B. MBHCF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $9.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNGKY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBHCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNGKY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBHCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBHCF is a better buy in the long-term than CNGKY.

Price Growth

CNGKY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -7.47% price change this week, while MBHCF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-2.78% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNGKY($20.6B) has a higher market cap than MBHCF($9.12M). CNGKY has higher P/E ratio than MBHCF: CNGKY (8.40) vs MBHCF (3.93). CNGKY YTD gains are higher at: -12.743 vs. MBHCF (-20.635). CNGKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 32.9B vs. MBHCF (8.07M). CNGKY has more cash in the bank: 59.8B vs. MBHCF (6.09M). MBHCF has less debt than CNGKY: MBHCF (45.1M) vs CNGKY (51.1B). CNGKY has higher revenues than MBHCF: CNGKY (74.5B) vs MBHCF (109M).
CNGKYMBHCFCNGKY / MBHCF
Capitalization20.6B9.12M225,952%
EBITDA32.9B8.07M407,834%
Gain YTD-12.743-20.63562%
P/E Ratio8.403.93214%
Revenue74.5B109M68,349%
Total Cash59.8B6.09M982,260%
Total Debt51.1B45.1M113,304%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMXPX27.06-0.14
-0.51%
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts P
JVSIX17.92-0.15
-0.83%
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value I
NEFSX45.96-0.59
-1.27%
Natixis US Equity Opportunities A
FFXFX86.11-1.27
-1.45%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529-F-2
JDWNX117.24-1.80
-1.51%
Janus Henderson Global Research N

CNGKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNGKY has been loosely correlated with HLPPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNGKY jumps, then HLPPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNGKY
1D Price
Change %
CNGKY100%
+0.49%
HLPPY - CNGKY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
CAOVY - CNGKY
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
CGSHY - CNGKY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUHJY - CNGKY
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
HLDCY - CNGKY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More

MBHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBHCF and BVERS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBHCF and BVERS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBHCF
1D Price
Change %
MBHCF100%
N/A
BVERS - MBHCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNGKY - MBHCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
BRST - MBHCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPAD - MBHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
OPEN - MBHCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.21%
More