Ad is loading...
CNIKF
Price
$0.68
Change
-$0.03 (-4.23%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
ERO
Price
$15.28
Change
-$0.15 (-0.97%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
115 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNIKF vs ERO

Header iconCNIKF vs ERO Comparison
Open Charts CNIKF vs EROBanner chart's image
Canada Nickel
Price$0.68
Change-$0.03 (-4.23%)
Volume$493.16K
CapitalizationN/A
Ero Copper
Price$15.28
Change-$0.15 (-0.97%)
Volume$255.58K
CapitalizationN/A
CNIKF vs ERO Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNIKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ERO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNIKF vs. ERO commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNIKF is a Sell and ERO is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CNIKF: $0.68 vs. ERO: $15.28)
Brand notoriety: CNIKF and ERO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNIKF: 1669% vs. ERO: 78%
Market capitalization -- CNIKF: $136.95M vs. ERO: $1.98B
CNIKF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $136.95M. ERO’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNIKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileERO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNIKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ERO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CNIKF and ERO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNIKF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ERO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNIKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ERO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ERO is a better buy in the short-term than CNIKF.

Price Growth

CNIKF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.24% price change this week, while ERO (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -11.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

ERO is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ERO($1.98B) has a higher market cap than CNIKF($137M). ERO YTD gains are higher at: -3.230 vs. CNIKF (-20.752). ERO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 208M vs. CNIKF (-3.24M). ERO has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. CNIKF (14.8M). CNIKF has less debt than ERO: CNIKF (232K) vs ERO (446M). ERO has higher revenues than CNIKF: ERO (427M) vs CNIKF (0).
CNIKFEROCNIKF / ERO
Capitalization137M1.98B7%
EBITDA-3.24M208M-2%
Gain YTD-20.752-3.230642%
P/E RatioN/A19.67-
Revenue0427M-
Total Cash14.8M112M13%
Total Debt232K446M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ERO: Fundamental Ratings
ERO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNIKFERO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNIKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
ERO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGCWX16.81-0.23
-1.35%
Lord Abbett Global Equity R6
HRCAX116.14-2.65
-2.23%
Harbor Capital Appreciation Admin
FGROX27.71-0.65
-2.29%
Emerald Growth Institutional
LCGFX31.02-0.76
-2.39%
William Blair Large Cap Growth I
RYTNX341.59-9.31
-2.65%
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy H

CNIKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNIKF and ERO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNIKF and ERO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNIKF
1D Price
Change %
CNIKF100%
-3.26%
ERO - CNIKF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
AUEEF - CNIKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-31.11%
HBM - CNIKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
IE - CNIKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.96%
NMG - CNIKF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
More

ERO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERO has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ERO jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ERO
1D Price
Change %
ERO100%
-0.97%
HBM - ERO
74%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
SCCO - ERO
73%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
FCX - ERO
72%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
LUNMF - ERO
71%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
CSCCF - ERO
68%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
More