CNIKF
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
136.95M
HBM
Price
$8.59
Change
-$0.05 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.45B
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNIKF vs HBM

Header iconCNIKF vs HBM Comparison
Open Charts CNIKF vs HBMBanner chart's image
Canada Nickel
Price$0.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.06K
Capitalization136.95M
Hudbay Minerals
Price$8.59
Change-$0.05 (-0.58%)
Volume$4.54M
Capitalization2.45B
CNIKF vs HBM Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNIKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNIKF vs. HBM commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNIKF is a Hold and HBM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CNIKF: $0.60 vs. HBM: $8.59)
Brand notoriety: CNIKF and HBM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNIKF: 27% vs. HBM: 112%
Market capitalization -- CNIKF: $136.95M vs. HBM: $2.45B
CNIKF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $136.95M. HBM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNIKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNIKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBM is a better buy in the long-term than CNIKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNIKF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNIKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HBM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBM is a better buy in the short-term than CNIKF.

Price Growth

CNIKF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.15% price change this week, while HBM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBM is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBM($2.45B) has a higher market cap than CNIKF($137M). HBM YTD gains are higher at: 6.049 vs. CNIKF (-5.321). HBM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 621M vs. CNIKF (-3.24M). HBM has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. CNIKF (14.8M). CNIKF has less debt than HBM: CNIKF (232K) vs HBM (1.38B). HBM has higher revenues than CNIKF: HBM (1.69B) vs CNIKF (0).
CNIKFHBMCNIKF / HBM
Capitalization137M2.45B6%
EBITDA-3.24M621M-1%
Gain YTD-5.3216.049-88%
P/E RatioN/A31.73-
Revenue01.69B-
Total Cash14.8M251M6%
Total Debt232K1.38B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBM: Fundamental Ratings
HBM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNIKFHBM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNIKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOTU2.090.10
+5.03%
Gaotu Techedu
CSCO60.230.41
+0.69%
Cisco Systems
GNRC161.240.96
+0.60%
Generac Holdings
URG1.11N/A
N/A
Ur-Energy
ASYS5.25-0.03
-0.57%
Amtech Systems

CNIKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNIKF and ERO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNIKF and ERO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNIKF
1D Price
Change %
CNIKF100%
+0.67%
ERO - CNIKF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
AUEEF - CNIKF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBM - CNIKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
IE - CNIKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
NMG - CNIKF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.63%
More

HBM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBM has been closely correlated with LUNMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBM jumps, then LUNMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBM
1D Price
Change %
HBM100%
-0.58%
LUNMF - HBM
81%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
FCX - HBM
80%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
SCCO - HBM
80%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
TECK - HBM
77%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
TGB - HBM
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
More