CNMVF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
NGLD
Price
$0.79
Change
+$0.08 (+11.27%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

CNMVF vs NGLD

Header iconCNMVF vs NGLD Comparison
Open Charts CNMVF vs NGLDBanner chart's image
Canoe Mining Ventures
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$638
CapitalizationN/A
Nevada Canyon Gold
Price$0.79
Change+$0.08 (+11.27%)
Volume$23.01K
CapitalizationN/A
CNMVF vs NGLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNMVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNMVF vs. NGLD commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNMVF is a Hold and NGLD is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CNMVF: $0.02 vs. NGLD: $0.79)
Brand notoriety: CNMVF and NGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNMVF: 76% vs. NGLD: 117%
Market capitalization -- CNMVF: $1M vs. NGLD: $27.36M
CNMVF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1M. NGLD’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $27.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNMVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNGLD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNMVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NGLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNMVF is a better buy in the long-term than NGLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNMVF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGLD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNMVF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NGLD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CNMVF and NGLD are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CNMVF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.50% price change this week, while NGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was +19.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

NGLD is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.21% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NGLD($27.4M) has a higher market cap than CNMVF($1M). CNMVF YTD gains are higher at: -60.855 vs. NGLD (-66.807). CNMVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -176.29K vs. NGLD (-1.86M). NGLD has more cash in the bank: 912K vs. CNMVF (279K). CNMVF has less debt than NGLD: CNMVF (86.9K) vs NGLD (1.07M). CNMVF (0) and NGLD (0) have equivalent revenues.
CNMVFNGLDCNMVF / NGLD
Capitalization1M27.4M4%
EBITDA-176.29K-1.86M9%
Gain YTD-60.855-66.80791%
P/E Ratio6.33N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash279K912K31%
Total Debt86.9K1.07M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNMVF vs NGLD: Fundamental Ratings
CNMVF
NGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
212
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10093
SMR RATING
1..100
10096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7597
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNMVF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as NGLD (93). This means that CNMVF’s stock grew similarly to NGLD’s over the last 12 months.

NGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CNMVF (100). This means that NGLD’s stock grew similarly to CNMVF’s over the last 12 months.

NGLD's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CNMVF (100). This means that NGLD’s stock grew similarly to CNMVF’s over the last 12 months.

CNMVF's Price Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as NGLD (97). This means that CNMVF’s stock grew similarly to NGLD’s over the last 12 months.

NGLD's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CNMVF (100). This means that NGLD’s stock grew similarly to CNMVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNMVFNGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNMVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCYX1.110.03
+2.78%
SCYNEXIS
TKR74.75-0.11
-0.15%
Timken Company (The)
DELL118.28-0.99
-0.83%
Dell Technologies
NVEC78.69-1.07
-1.34%
NVE Corp
LUMN5.99-0.22
-3.54%
Lumen Technologies

CNMVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNMVF has been loosely correlated with DBORF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNMVF jumps, then DBORF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNMVF
1D Price
Change %
CNMVF100%
+14.50%
DBORF - CNMVF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NGLD - CNMVF
33%
Loosely correlated
+11.27%
EDVMF - CNMVF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
ORAAF - CNMVF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
FSXLF - CNMVF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
More

NGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NGLD has been loosely correlated with CNMVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NGLD jumps, then CNMVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGLD
1D Price
Change %
NGLD100%
+11.27%
CNMVF - NGLD
33%
Loosely correlated
+14.50%
NSGCF - NGLD
7%
Poorly correlated
-9.59%
IDR - NGLD
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
NCMBF - NGLD
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMEX - NGLD
-2%
Poorly correlated
+12.50%
More