CNMVF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 25 closing price
TBXXF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

CNMVF vs TBXXF

Header iconCNMVF vs TBXXF Comparison
Open Charts CNMVF vs TBXXFBanner chart's image
Canoe Mining Ventures
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
TURMALINA METALS
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.36K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CNMVF vs TBXXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
CNMVF vs. TBXXF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNMVF is a Hold and TBXXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CNMVF: $0.02 vs. TBXXF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: CNMVF and TBXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNMVF: 100% vs. TBXXF: 90%
Market capitalization -- CNMVF: $1M vs. TBXXF: $13.83M
CNMVF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1M. TBXXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNMVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTBXXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNMVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TBXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CNMVF and TBXXF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

CNMVF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TBXXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TBXXF($13.8M) has a higher market cap than CNMVF($1M). TBXXF YTD gains are higher at: -54.498 vs. CNMVF (-65.812). CNMVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -176.29K vs. TBXXF (-4.46M). TBXXF has more cash in the bank: 3.2M vs. CNMVF (279K). CNMVF (0) and TBXXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CNMVFTBXXFCNMVF / TBXXF
Capitalization1M13.8M7%
EBITDA-176.29K-4.46M4%
Gain YTD-65.812-54.498121%
P/E Ratio6.33N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash279K3.2M9%
Total Debt86.9KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNMVF: Fundamental Ratings
CNMVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

CNMVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNMVF has been loosely correlated with DBORF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNMVF jumps, then DBORF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNMVF
1D Price
Change %
CNMVF100%
N/A
DBORF - CNMVF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NGLD - CNMVF
33%
Poorly correlated
-12.79%
FSXLF - CNMVF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
KDKCF - CNMVF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
TBXXF - CNMVF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
More

TBXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBXXF and MNSAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBXXF and MNSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBXXF
1D Price
Change %
TBXXF100%
-2.98%
MNSAF - TBXXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TFPM - TBXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
OMGGF - TBXXF
11%
Poorly correlated
+8.50%
KDKCF - TBXXF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
FSXLF - TBXXF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
More