CNOB
Price
$26.52
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
7 days until earnings call
FFWM
Price
$7.69
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNOB vs FFWM

Header iconCNOB vs FFWM Comparison
Open Charts CNOB vs FFWMBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$26.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$247.65K
CapitalizationN/A
First Foundation
Price$7.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$580.24K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CNOB vs FFWM Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CNOB vs. FFWM commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOB is a StrongBuy and FFWM is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CNOB: $26.52 vs. FFWM: $7.69)
Brand notoriety: CNOB and FFWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOB: 130% vs. FFWM: 110%
Market capitalization -- CNOB: $748.88M vs. FFWM: $407.13M
CNOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $748.88M. FFWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $407.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFWM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNOB is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFWM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFWM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CNOB and FFWM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CNOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.29% price change this week, while FFWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +15.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNOB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNOB($749M) has a higher market cap than FFWM($407M). CNOB has higher P/E ratio than FFWM: CNOB (9.21) vs FFWM (3.63). CNOB YTD gains are higher at: 18.835 vs. FFWM (-20.324). CNOB has less debt than FFWM: CNOB (1.03B) vs FFWM (1.58B). CNOB has higher revenues than FFWM: CNOB (269M) vs FFWM (175M).
CNOBFFWMCNOB / FFWM
Capitalization749M407M184%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.835-20.324-93%
P/E Ratio9.213.63253%
Revenue269M175M154%
Total Cash61.4MN/A-
Total Debt1.03B1.58B65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNOB vs FFWM: Fundamental Ratings
CNOB
FFWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1412
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65100
SMR RATING
1..100
1826
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1279
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFWM's Valuation (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (52). This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (100). This means that CNOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (26). This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (43). This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFWM (79). This means that CNOB’s stock grew significantly faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBFFWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

CNOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOB has been closely correlated with BRKL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNOB jumps, then BRKL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOB
1D Price
Change %
CNOB100%
+0.19%
BRKL - CNOB
85%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
HBNC - CNOB
85%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
UBSI - CNOB
85%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
WASH - CNOB
85%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
BY - CNOB
84%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
More

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with CNOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then CNOB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
+4.34%
CNOB - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
VLY - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
EGBN - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
WSBC - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
HBNC - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
More