Advertisement
CNP vs ETR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Entergy (ETR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Entergy (ETR) has shown stronger recent momentum with YTD returns around 28% compared to CenterPoint Energy's (CNP) 14%.
- Both utilities benefit from data center load growth, but ETR reports higher industrial sales growth targets of 13-14% through 2029.
- CNP trades at a P/E ratio (price-to-earnings ratio) of about 26.7 with a 2.1% dividend yield, while ETR is at 30 with a similar 2.2% yield.
- Analyst consensus targets suggest modest upside for both, with CNP at $46 (6% potential) and ETR at $118 (1% potential).
- Recent Q1 earnings showed ETR beating EPS estimates at $0.86 versus $0.84 expected, while CNP was in-line at $0.56.
- Market caps stand at $28.5B for CNP and $53.7B for ETR, reflecting ETR's larger scale.
Introduction
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Entergy (ETR) are prominent players in the U.S. utilities sector, delivering electric transmission and distribution services amid rising demand from data centers and industrial growth. This stock comparison examines their recent performance, growth drivers, and market positioning in the current environment of stable energy needs and regulatory oversight. Traders seeking defensive positions with dividend income, or investors eyeing sector rotation into utilities, may find value in understanding their relative strengths, such as load growth in key regions like Texas and the Gulf Coast.
CNP Overview and Recent Performance
CenterPoint Energy (CNP), a Houston-based utility holding company, operates electric transmission and distribution for over 2.8 million customers in Texas, as well as natural gas services in six states. In recent market activity, shares have traded around $43.50, up approximately 14% YTD and 12-15% over the past year, outperforming some utility peers but lagging broader indices. Q1 2026 results featured non-GAAP EPS of $0.56 in-line with expectations, revenue of $2.98B beating forecasts, and reaffirmed full-year guidance of $1.89-$1.91 non-GAAP EPS. Sentiment has been bolstered by 12.2 GW of committed industrial load in Greater Houston, including 8 GW of data centers by 2029, driving capital plans upward. Analyst upgrades, like Evercore ISI's target to $45, reflect optimism on load growth, though regulatory risks in Texas remain a factor.
ETR Overview and Recent Performance
Entergy (ETR), headquartered in New Orleans, is an integrated utility serving 3 million customers across Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas with generation, transmission, and distribution. Shares hover near $117, delivering robust YTD gains of about 28% and 39-42% over the past year, significantly outpacing the sector. Recent Q1 2026 earnings reported adjusted EPS of $0.86, surpassing estimates of $0.84, with revenue at $3.19B above expectations, fueled by 6% retail sales growth. Key drivers include hyperscale data center deals, like with Meta, targeting 8.5% retail sales CAGR through 2029 and a $57B four-year capital plan. Positive analyst notes, such as Citi's $121 target, underscore strong momentum, balanced against rising operational costs.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like momentum, sector rotation, and trend analysis, with timeframes from 15 minutes to multi-day holds. Standout performers boast annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7, particularly in sectors like semiconductors, leveraged ETFs, and finance. For instance, a volatility bot achieved +169% annualized with a 75% win rate, while semiconductor strategies hit +95% returns. This section highlights bots best suited to current market conditions, offering traders tools with proven stats like 70-80% win rates and profit-to-drawdown ratios over 17. Explore these for potential edges in dynamic environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CNP and ETR operate regulated utility models focused on electric infrastructure, but ETR's integrated generation provides broader exposure versus CNP's transmission/distribution emphasis. Growth drivers diverge: CNP leverages Houston's 12.2 GW load commitments (7-9% EPS CAGR target), while ETR eyes 13-14% industrial growth via data center pacts (>8% EPS CAGR). Recent momentum favors ETR with superior YTD/1-year returns, though CNP offers a lower P/E (26.7 vs. 30). Risk profiles are similar with low betas (~0.5), but ETR faces higher operational costs; both yield ~2.1-2.2%. Sentiment tilts toward ETR for scale ($53.7B vs. $28.5B market cap), trading off CNP's relative valuation appeal.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors ETR due to its superior trend consistency, stronger YTD momentum, recent earnings beats, and data center catalysts positioning it ahead in utilities' load growth race. While CNP shows stability and attractive valuation, ETR's relative performance and scale suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, based on observable patterns.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNP is a Hold and ETR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileETR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CNP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ETR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ETR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- ETR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CNP (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.46% price change this week, while ETR (@Electric Utilities) price change was -2.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNP is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
ETR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electric Utilities (-0.83% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| CNP | ETR | CNP / ETR | |
| Capitalization | 27.2B | 49.9B | 55% |
| EBITDA | 3.81B | 6.24B | 61% |
| Gain YTD | 8.918 | 19.383 | 46% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.48 | 27.81 | 92% |
| Revenue | 9.41B | 13.3B | 71% |
| Total Cash | 1.19B | 3.57B | 33% |
| Total Debt | 24.7B | 34.1B | 72% |
CNP | ETR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ETR's Valuation (75) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CNP (77). This means that ETR’s stock grew similarly to CNP’s over the last 12 months.
ETR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CNP (13). This means that ETR’s stock grew similarly to CNP’s over the last 12 months.
ETR's SMR Rating (66) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CNP (72). This means that ETR’s stock grew similarly to CNP’s over the last 12 months.
ETR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CNP (51). This means that ETR’s stock grew similarly to CNP’s over the last 12 months.
ETR's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CNP (46). This means that ETR’s stock grew similarly to CNP’s over the last 12 months.
| CNP | ETR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 31% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 36% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 17 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSBA | 20.63 | -0.10 | -0.50% |
| Return Stacked Bonds & Mrg Arbtrg ETF | |||
| GAEM | 26.52 | -0.15 | -0.55% |
| Simplify Gamma Emerging Market Bond ETF | |||
| BCD | 37.74 | -0.41 | -1.07% |
| abrdn Blmb AllCmdLDSK1Fr ETF | |||
| INTF | 40.62 | -0.66 | -1.60% |
| iShares International Equity Factor ETF | |||
| FTWO | 44.60 | -1.04 | -2.28% |
| Strive Natural Resources and SecurityETF | |||
CNP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNP has been closely correlated with AEE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNP jumps, then AEE could also see price increases.
ETR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ETR has been closely correlated with AEE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ETR jumps, then AEE could also see price increases.