CNS
Price
$74.57
Change
+$1.00 (+1.36%)
Updated
Apr 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.7B
One day until earnings call
PSBD
Price
$12.80
Change
-$0.14 (-1.08%)
Updated
Apr 14, 04:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
530.29M
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNS vs PSBD

Header iconCNS vs PSBD Comparison
Open Charts CNS vs PSBDBanner chart's image
Cohen & Steers
Price$74.57
Change+$1.00 (+1.36%)
Volume$1.73K
Capitalization3.7B
Palmer Square Capital BDC
Price$12.80
Change-$0.14 (-1.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization530.29M
CNS vs PSBD Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNS vs. PSBD commentary
Apr 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNS is a Hold and PSBD is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 15, 2025
Stock price -- (CNS: $73.57 vs. PSBD: $12.94)
Brand notoriety: CNS and PSBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNS: 94% vs. PSBD: 92%
Market capitalization -- CNS: $3.7B vs. PSBD: $530.29M
CNS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.7B. PSBD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $530.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePSBD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PSBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSBD is a better buy in the long-term than CNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSBD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PSBD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSBD is a better buy in the short-term than CNS.

Price Growth

CNS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.87% price change this week, while PSBD (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +17.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

PSBD is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+17.37% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNS($3.7B) has a higher market cap than PSBD($530M). CNS has higher P/E ratio than PSBD: CNS (28.73) vs PSBD (4.77). PSBD YTD gains are higher at: -12.499 vs. CNS (-19.758). CNS has less debt than PSBD: CNS (140M) vs PSBD (642M). CNS has higher revenues than PSBD: CNS (490M) vs PSBD (109M).
CNSPSBDCNS / PSBD
Capitalization3.7B530M698%
EBITDA184MN/A-
Gain YTD-19.758-12.499158%
P/E Ratio28.734.77603%
Revenue490M109M450%
Total Cash265MN/A-
Total Debt140M642M22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSPSBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
15%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
10%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDOIX9.930.27
+2.80%
iShares MSCI Total Intl Idx Instl
HSWSX18.040.45
+2.56%
Hartford Schroders International Stk R4
CFAGX39.950.56
+1.42%
Commerce MidCap Growth
NSFHX11.270.15
+1.35%
Natixis Target Retirement 2040 N
OCSVX9.220.09
+0.99%
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Value C

PSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSBD has been loosely correlated with CGBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSBD jumps, then CGBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSBD
1D Price
Change %
PSBD100%
+1.57%
CGBD - PSBD
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
SLRC - PSBD
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
GAIN - PSBD
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.33%
FDUS - PSBD
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MFIC - PSBD
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More