Ad is loading...
COAGX vs NLSCX
COAGX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts COAGX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.72
Change+$0.16 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
COAGX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COAGX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COAGX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. COAGX (48.3M). COAGX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: COAGX (0.84) vs NLSCX (0.00). COAGX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: COAGX (33 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). COAGX (3.20) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. COAGX (40.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than COAGX: NLSCX (1000) vs COAGX (5000). COAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.07 vs. NLSCX (4.28). COAGX return over 5 years is better than : 241.15 vs. NLSCX (23.56).
| COAGX | NLSCX | COAGX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.08 | 2.43 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.20 | 2.43 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.521 | -0.735 | 887% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.3M | 7.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 4.28 | 306% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.38 | 7.87 | 742% |
| Returns for 5 years | 241.15 | 23.56 | 1,024% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.03 | 27.43 | 376% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers