Ad is loading...
COAGX vs NLSIX
COAGX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts COAGX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.85
Change+$0.18 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
COAGX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COAGX vs. NLSIX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COAGX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. COAGX (48.3M). COAGX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: COAGX (0.84) vs NLSIX (0.02). COAGX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: COAGX (33 years) vs NLSIX (13 years). COAGX (3.20) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. COAGX (40.00). COAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: COAGX (5000) vs NLSIX (1000000). COAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.07 vs. NLSIX (5.44). COAGX return over 5 years is better than : 241.15 vs. NLSIX (31.07).
| COAGX | NLSIX | COAGX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.08 | 1.32 | 233% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.20 | 1.32 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.521 | -0.427 | 1,528% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.3M | 7.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.02 | 3,814% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.07 | 5.44 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.38 | 11.78 | 495% |
| Returns for 5 years | 241.15 | 31.07 | 776% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.03 | 42.90 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...