Ad is loading...
COAGX vs QLENX
COAGX vs QLENX Comparison
Open Charts COAGX vs QLENX
COAGX vs QLENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COAGX vs. QLENX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COAGX is a Hold and QLENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLENX has more cash in the bank: 3.52B vs. COAGX (51M). QLENX pays higher dividends than COAGX: QLENX (6.56) vs COAGX (0.84). COAGX was incepted earlier than QLENX: COAGX (33 years) vs QLENX (12 years). QLENX (5.19) is less costly to investors than COAGX (3.20). QLENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 362.00 vs. COAGX (40.00). QLENX has a lower initial minimum investment than COAGX: QLENX (2500) vs COAGX (5000). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. COAGX (18.86). COAGX return over 5 years is better than : 304.18 vs. QLENX (168.30).
| COAGX | QLENX | COAGX / QLENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.08 | 5.18 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.20 | 5.19 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.610 | 9.622 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51M | 3.52B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 6.56 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.86 | 22.95 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.64 | 85.89 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 304.18 | 168.30 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.80 | 139.85 | 79% |