It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COEP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYMAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COEP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YMAB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
COEP (@Biotechnology) experienced а +7.76% price change this week, while YMAB (@Biotechnology) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.27%.
COEP is expected to report earnings on Mar 29, 2023.
YMAB is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
COEP | YMAB | COEP / YMAB | |
Capitalization | 7.15M | 577M | 1% |
EBITDA | -14.84M | -27M | 55% |
Gain YTD | -77.331 | 106.158 | -73% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | 86.5M | - |
Total Cash | 1.56M | 77.8M | 2% |
Total Debt | 1.79M | 1.27M | 140% |
COEP | YMAB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COEP's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as YMAB (58) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that COEP’s stock grew similarly to YMAB’s over the last 12 months.
COEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as YMAB (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that COEP’s stock grew similarly to YMAB’s over the last 12 months.
YMAB's SMR Rating (95) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as COEP (100) in the null industry. This means that YMAB’s stock grew similarly to COEP’s over the last 12 months.
YMAB's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COEP (92) in the null industry. This means that YMAB’s stock grew somewhat faster than COEP’s over the last 12 months.
YMAB's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as COEP (100) in the null industry. This means that YMAB’s stock grew similarly to COEP’s over the last 12 months.
COEP | YMAB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago87% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago46% | 1 day ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 8 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago75% | 14 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YMAB has been loosely correlated with RCKT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YMAB jumps, then RCKT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YMAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
YMAB | 100% | -0.57% | ||
RCKT - YMAB | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.59% | ||
IDYA - YMAB | 35% Loosely correlated | -5.09% | ||
PGEN - YMAB | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
SWTX - YMAB | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.35% | ||
PLRX - YMAB | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
More |