COKE
Price
$108.57
Change
-$0.09 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jun 9, 10:58 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.85B
51 days until earnings call
SAFT
Price
$80.03
Change
+$0.41 (+0.51%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COKE vs SAFT

Header iconCOKE vs SAFT Comparison
Open Charts COKE vs SAFTBanner chart's image
Coca-Cola Consolidated
Price$108.57
Change-$0.09 (-0.08%)
Volume$360
Capitalization7.85B
Safety Insurance Group
Price$80.03
Change+$0.41 (+0.51%)
Volume$36.29K
Capitalization1.22B
COKE vs SAFT Comparison Chart
Loading...
COKE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COKE vs. SAFT commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COKE is a StrongBuy and SAFT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (COKE: $108.66 vs. SAFT: $80.03)
Brand notoriety: COKE and SAFT are both not notable
COKE represents the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic, while SAFT is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COKE: 322% vs. SAFT: 69%
Market capitalization -- COKE: $7.85B vs. SAFT: $1.22B
COKE [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $7.85B. SAFT’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $24.2B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COKE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COKE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COKE is a better buy in the long-term than SAFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COKE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COKE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SAFT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAFT is a better buy in the short-term than COKE.

Price Growth

COKE (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -5.22% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.44%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

COKE is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.19% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.25% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COKE($7.86B) has a higher market cap than SAFT($1.22B). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than COKE: SAFT (63.23) vs COKE (19.27). SAFT YTD gains are higher at: -0.626 vs. COKE (-10.320). COKE has more cash in the bank: 635M vs. SAFT (518M). SAFT has less debt than COKE: SAFT (49.8M) vs COKE (735M). COKE has higher revenues than SAFT: COKE (6.65B) vs SAFT (926M).
COKESAFTCOKE / SAFT
Capitalization7.86B1.22B646%
EBITDA899MN/A-
Gain YTD-10.320-0.6261,649%
P/E Ratio19.2763.2330%
Revenue6.65B926M719%
Total Cash635M518M123%
Total Debt735M49.8M1,476%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COKE vs SAFT: Fundamental Ratings
COKE
SAFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1248
SMR RATING
1..100
2775
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7581
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (22) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COKE (56) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than COKE’s over the last 12 months.

COKE's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that COKE’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

COKE's SMR Rating (27) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that COKE’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as COKE (62) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to COKE’s over the last 12 months.

COKE's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAFT (81) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that COKE’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COKESAFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COKE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFNL41.330.67
+1.64%
Davis Select Financial ETF
IJJ121.121.27
+1.06%
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
FFC15.870.11
+0.70%
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Securities Fund
FAAR27.200.10
+0.37%
First Trust Alt Abs Ret Strat ETF
OVF27.050.09
+0.35%
Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF

COKE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COKE and KO have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COKE and KO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COKE
1D Price
Change %
COKE100%
+2.35%
KO - COKE
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
CCEP - COKE
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
KDP - COKE
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
ZVIA - COKE
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.98%
KOF - COKE
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
More

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
+0.51%
CNA - SAFT
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
UFCS - SAFT
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
HMN - SAFT
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
L - SAFT
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
CINF - SAFT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
More