COKE vs SAFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COKE is a Hold and SAFT is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COKE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- COKE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COKE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COKE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SAFT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
COKE (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.47%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
COKE is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.46% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.73% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| COKE | SAFT | COKE / SAFT | |
| Capitalization | 7.86B | 1.22B | 646% |
| EBITDA | 899M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.056 | -6.050 | -150% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.27 | 63.23 | 30% |
| Revenue | 6.65B | 926M | 719% |
| Total Cash | 635M | 518M | 123% |
| Total Debt | 735M | 49.8M | 1,476% |
COKE | SAFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAFT's Valuation (22) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COKE (60) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than COKE’s over the last 12 months.
COKE's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAFT (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that COKE’s stock grew significantly faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
COKE's SMR Rating (22) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (76) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that COKE’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
COKE's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAFT (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that COKE’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
COKE's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (98) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that COKE’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
| COKE | SAFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 17 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 6 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 46% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RA | 12.94 | 0.12 | +0.94% |
| Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund | |||
| GAUG | 34.43 | 0.15 | +0.44% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Aug | |||
| SPSB | 30.06 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| SPDR® Portfolio Short Term Corp Bd ETF | |||
| FMNY | 25.85 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust New York High Inc Mncpl ETF | |||
| SSPY | 76.03 | -0.05 | -0.07% |
| Stratified LargeCap Index ETF | |||
COKE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that COKE and CCEP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COKE and CCEP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COKE | 100% | -1.35% | ||
| CCEP - COKE | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| KO - COKE | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| KDP - COKE | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
| ZVIA - COKE | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.64% | ||
| KOF - COKE | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||
SAFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | 100% | -1.20% | ||
| UFCS - SAFT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| CNA - SAFT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| L - SAFT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| THG - SAFT | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| CINF - SAFT | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||