It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COMM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileERIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COMM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ERIC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
COMM (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -11.70% price change this week, while ERIC (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -3.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.96%.
COMM is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
ERIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.
The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
COMM | ERIC | COMM / ERIC | |
Capitalization | 284M | 18B | 2% |
EBITDA | 519M | -8.9B | -6% |
Gain YTD | 47.163 | 31.867 | 148% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 13.57 | - |
Revenue | 5.79B | 263B | 2% |
Total Cash | 544M | 50.3B | 1% |
Total Debt | 9.32B | 54.3B | 17% |
COMM | ERIC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ERIC's Valuation (8) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for COMM (92). This means that ERIC’s stock grew significantly faster than COMM’s over the last 12 months.
ERIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as COMM (100). This means that ERIC’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.
ERIC's SMR Rating (87) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as COMM (100). This means that ERIC’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.
COMM's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ERIC (41). This means that COMM’s stock grew similarly to ERIC’s over the last 12 months.
ERIC's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COMM (84). This means that ERIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than COMM’s over the last 12 months.
COMM | ERIC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago59% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago82% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 5 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago51% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMM has been loosely correlated with CLFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMM jumps, then CLFD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COMM | 100% | -6.53% | ||
CLFD - COMM | 33% Loosely correlated | -4.59% | ||
VIAV - COMM | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
ERIC - COMM | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
NTGR - COMM | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
UI - COMM | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ERIC has been loosely correlated with NOK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ERIC jumps, then NOK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ERIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ERIC | 100% | -0.38% | ||
NOK - ERIC | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
ADTN - ERIC | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
ERIXF - ERIC | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
CLFD - ERIC | 39% Loosely correlated | -4.59% | ||
KN - ERIC | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
More |