It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COMM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COMM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
COMM (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +11.32% price change this week, while UI (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -0.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.49%.
COMM is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
UI is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.
The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
COMM | UI | COMM / UI | |
Capitalization | 284M | 7B | 4% |
EBITDA | 519M | 545M | 95% |
Gain YTD | 88.298 | 150.326 | 59% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 18.72 | - |
Revenue | 5.79B | 1.88B | 308% |
Total Cash | 544M | 97.7M | 557% |
Total Debt | 9.32B | 1.05B | 888% |
COMM | UI | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COMM's Valuation (91) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as UI (93) in the null industry. This means that COMM’s stock grew similarly to UI’s over the last 12 months.
UI's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COMM (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that UI’s stock grew somewhat faster than COMM’s over the last 12 months.
UI's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COMM (100) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that UI’s stock grew significantly faster than COMM’s over the last 12 months.
UI's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as COMM (35) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that UI’s stock grew similarly to COMM’s over the last 12 months.
UI's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for COMM (83) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that UI’s stock grew significantly faster than COMM’s over the last 12 months.
COMM | UI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago82% | 3 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 10 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago67% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago64% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that COMM and ERIC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COMM and ERIC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COMM | 100% | -0.56% | ||
ERIC - COMM | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
NTGR - COMM | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.56% | ||
VIAV - COMM | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
CLFD - COMM | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.55% | ||
BDC - COMM | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
More |