COMP
Price
$6.69
Change
-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Updated
Nov 14, 03:17 PM (EDT)
110 days until earnings call
QLYS
Price
$149.56
Change
-$1.81 (-1.20%)
Updated
Nov 14, 03:34 PM (EDT)
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COMP vs QLYS

Header iconCOMP vs QLYS Comparison
Open Charts COMP vs QLYSBanner chart's image
Compass
Price$6.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Volume$1.85K
CapitalizationN/A
Qualys
Price$149.56
Change-$1.81 (-1.20%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
COMP vs QLYS Comparison Chart
Loading...
COMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COMP vs. QLYS commentary
Nov 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COMP is a Hold and QLYS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2024
Stock price -- (COMP: $6.70 vs. QLYS: $151.37)
Brand notoriety: COMP and QLYS are both not notable
COMP represents the Real Estate Development, while QLYS is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COMP: 71% vs. QLYS: 67%
Market capitalization -- COMP: $1.75B vs. QLYS: $6.17B
COMP [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.75B. QLYS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.32B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQLYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QLYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QLYS is a better buy in the long-term than COMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COMP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COMP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QLYS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QLYS is a better buy in the short-term than COMP.

Price Growth

COMP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +3.72% price change this week, while QLYS (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.15%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

COMP is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

QLYS is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-2.51% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

@Packaged Software (+0.49% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLYS($6.17B) has a higher market cap than COMP($1.75B). COMP YTD gains are higher at: 78.191 vs. QLYS (-22.881). QLYS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 190M vs. COMP (-216.4M). QLYS has more cash in the bank: 426M vs. COMP (167M). QLYS has less debt than COMP: QLYS (28.7M) vs COMP (534M). COMP has higher revenues than QLYS: COMP (4.89B) vs QLYS (554M).
COMPQLYSCOMP / QLYS
Capitalization1.75B6.17B28%
EBITDA-216.4M190M-114%
Gain YTD78.191-22.881-342%
P/E RatioN/A41.51-
Revenue4.89B554M882%
Total Cash167M426M39%
Total Debt534M28.7M1,861%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QLYS: Fundamental Ratings
QLYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
20
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COMPQLYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYXU50.31N/A
N/A
iShares International High Yield Bd ETF
EQUL27.70N/A
N/A
NYLI Engender Equality ETF
FTSD90.33-0.01
-0.02%
Franklin Short Duration US Govt ETF
IVOO110.89-0.55
-0.49%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
GSSC74.03-0.66
-0.88%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF

COMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COMP has been loosely correlated with RDFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COMP jumps, then RDFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COMP
1D Price
Change %
COMP100%
N/A
RDFN - COMP
66%
Loosely correlated
-6.01%
MTTR - COMP
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
HOUS - COMP
65%
Loosely correlated
+5.74%
OPEN - COMP
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
EXPI - COMP
64%
Loosely correlated
-4.26%
More

QLYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with RPD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then RPD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLYS
1D Price
Change %
QLYS100%
-2.06%
RPD - QLYS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
FOXO - QLYS
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
DJCO - QLYS
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
CLSK - QLYS
49%
Loosely correlated
-15.03%
COIN - QLYS
49%
Loosely correlated
-10.78%
More