CONXF
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
EMOTF
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

CONXF vs EMOTF

Header iconCONXF vs EMOTF Comparison
Open Charts CONXF vs EMOTFBanner chart's image
NICKEL 28 CAP
Price$0.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$530
CapitalizationN/A
Emerita Resources
Price$0.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$37.47K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CONXF vs EMOTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
CONXF vs. EMOTF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CONXF is a Hold and EMOTF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CONXF: $0.57 vs. EMOTF: $0.49)
Brand notoriety: CONXF and EMOTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CONXF: 1% vs. EMOTF: 119%
Market capitalization -- CONXF: $82.39M vs. EMOTF: $65.55M
CONXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $82.39M. EMOTF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $65.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CONXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMOTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CONXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EMOTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CONXF is a better buy in the long-term than EMOTF.

Price Growth

CONXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.70% price change this week, while EMOTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CONXF($82.4M) has a higher market cap than EMOTF($65.5M). EMOTF YTD gains are higher at: 14.843 vs. CONXF (-12.374). CONXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.9M vs. EMOTF (-18.85M). CONXF has more cash in the bank: 10.6M vs. EMOTF (8.12M). EMOTF has less debt than CONXF: EMOTF (339K) vs CONXF (56.6M). CONXF (0) and EMOTF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CONXFEMOTFCONXF / EMOTF
Capitalization82.4M65.5M126%
EBITDA17.9M-18.85M-95%
Gain YTD-12.37414.843-83%
P/E Ratio8.09N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash10.6M8.12M131%
Total Debt56.6M339K16,696%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

CONXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CONXF and AAUKF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CONXF and AAUKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CONXF
1D Price
Change %
CONXF100%
-1.22%
AAUKF - CONXF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVPMF - CONXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPPKF - CONXF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
EMOTF - CONXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ULTHF - CONXF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
More

EMOTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMOTF and TECK have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMOTF and TECK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMOTF
1D Price
Change %
EMOTF100%
N/A
TECK - EMOTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
AAGFF - EMOTF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
CPPKF - EMOTF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
GOLXF - EMOTF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
ULTHF - EMOTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
More