It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COOP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEZPW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COOP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EZPW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
COOP (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +3.37% price change this week, while EZPW (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +5.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.60%.
COOP is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.
EZPW is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
COOP | EZPW | COOP / EZPW | |
Capitalization | 5.04B | 625M | 806% |
EBITDA | 651M | 168M | 388% |
Gain YTD | 52.672 | 44.165 | 119% |
P/E Ratio | 10.51 | 13.89 | 76% |
Revenue | 2.32B | 1.09B | 214% |
Total Cash | 571M | 219M | 261% |
Total Debt | 7.45B | 607M | 1,228% |
COOP | EZPW | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 5 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
COOP's Valuation (58) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as EZPW (76) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COOP’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.
COOP's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as EZPW (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COOP’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.
COOP's SMR Rating (64) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as EZPW (66) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COOP’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.
COOP's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as EZPW (45) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COOP’s stock grew similarly to EZPW’s over the last 12 months.
COOP's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EZPW (70) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COOP’s stock grew somewhat faster than EZPW’s over the last 12 months.
COOP | EZPW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 9 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago61% | 18 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
IDNA | 23.66 | 0.36 | +1.53% |
iShares Genomics Immnlgy & Hlthcr ETF | |||
ROUS | 53.83 | 0.39 | +0.73% |
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | |||
DSTL | 58.17 | 0.38 | +0.66% |
Distillate US Fdmtl Stblty & Val ETF | |||
MPAY | 25.89 | 0.12 | +0.47% |
Akros Monthly Payout ETF | |||
LQDB | 85.88 | -0.04 | -0.05% |
iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COOP has been closely correlated with PFSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COOP jumps, then PFSI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COOP | 100% | +1.11% | ||
PFSI - COOP | 69% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
WD - COOP | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
ENVA - COOP | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.67% | ||
AGM - COOP | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
NAVI - COOP | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EZPW has been loosely correlated with FCFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EZPW jumps, then FCFS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EZPW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EZPW | 100% | +4.22% | ||
FCFS - EZPW | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
UPBD - EZPW | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
ENVA - EZPW | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.67% | ||
AGM - EZPW | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
COOP - EZPW | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
More |